2017
DOI: 10.1101/215707
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accurate Reconstruction of Microbial Strains from Metagenomic Sequencing Using Representative Reference Genomes

Abstract: Abstract. Exploring the genetic diversity of microbes within the environment through metagenomic 5 sequencing first requires classifying these reads into taxonomic groups. Current methods compare these 6 sequencing data with existing biased and limited reference databases. Several recent evaluation studies 7 demonstrate that current methods either lack sufficient sensitivity for species-level assignments or suffer 8 from false positives, overestimating the number of species in the metagenome. Both are especial… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tools for detecting microbial species from metagenomes include metagenomic classifiers that report taxonomic relative abundances [ 21 ], such as Kraken2 [ 22 , 23 ], KrakenUniq [ 24 ] and the Megan Alignment Tool (MALT) [ 25 ], as well as species identification pipelines that classify individual reads, such as Sigma [ 3 ], Strain Prediction and Analysis using Representative Sequences (SPARSE) [ 26 ], Bayesian Reestimation of Abundance with KrakEN (Bracken) [ 27 ], and Heuristic Operations for Pathogen Screening (HOPS, specifically designed for ancient DNA) [ 28 ]. The metagenomic classifiers Kraken2, KrakenUniq and MALT provide a good starting point for exploratory studies, especially when it is not known which pathogens may be present [ 29 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Tools for detecting microbial species from metagenomes include metagenomic classifiers that report taxonomic relative abundances [ 21 ], such as Kraken2 [ 22 , 23 ], KrakenUniq [ 24 ] and the Megan Alignment Tool (MALT) [ 25 ], as well as species identification pipelines that classify individual reads, such as Sigma [ 3 ], Strain Prediction and Analysis using Representative Sequences (SPARSE) [ 26 ], Bayesian Reestimation of Abundance with KrakEN (Bracken) [ 27 ], and Heuristic Operations for Pathogen Screening (HOPS, specifically designed for ancient DNA) [ 28 ]. The metagenomic classifiers Kraken2, KrakenUniq and MALT provide a good starting point for exploratory studies, especially when it is not known which pathogens may be present [ 29 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These tools, however, can be slow, require a large amount of RAM [ 24 , 25 , 28 ], and are prone to false positive identifications of low abundance species [ 30 ]. The species identification pipelines Sigma [ 3 ] and SPARSE [ 26 ] are based on more sophisticated statistical models but they require alignment to a large database, which can be slow [ 26 ], and do not provide statistical support for individual species identifications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%