2004
DOI: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000130995.18334.8b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of transpulmonary thermodilution versus gravimetric measurement of extravascular lung water

Abstract: Measurement of extravascular lung water using transpulmonary thermodilution with a single indicator is very closely correlated with gravimetric measurement of lung water in both increased permeability and hydrostatic pulmonary edema.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

9
135
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 222 publications
(146 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
9
135
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Scillia et al 20 revealed a significant correlation between CT derived density and EVLW by means of double indicator dilution in a canine OA model; this was confirmed later by Kuzkov et al 21 The single indicator thermodilution determination of EVLW has been validated clinically against the double indicator dilution method 16,22 and has been substantiated in animal studies against gravimetry. [23][24][25] As the PiCCO calculation of EVLW excludes both blood and tissue volumes, we anticipated lower PiCCO derived EVLW values compared with CT determined lung weights, but we expected EVLW to increase as CT lung weight increased with OA injury. However, no correlation between EVLW and either lung weight (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Scillia et al 20 revealed a significant correlation between CT derived density and EVLW by means of double indicator dilution in a canine OA model; this was confirmed later by Kuzkov et al 21 The single indicator thermodilution determination of EVLW has been validated clinically against the double indicator dilution method 16,22 and has been substantiated in animal studies against gravimetry. [23][24][25] As the PiCCO calculation of EVLW excludes both blood and tissue volumes, we anticipated lower PiCCO derived EVLW values compared with CT determined lung weights, but we expected EVLW to increase as CT lung weight increased with OA injury. However, no correlation between EVLW and either lung weight (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests that the PiCCO system in this porcine OA model underestimates lung water in more edematous lungs. Although studies show reasonable correlation between PiCCO EVLW and gravimetry, [23][24][25] two of these investigators 23,24 and Effros et al 26 provide evidence that thermodilution methods may underestimate EVLW when vascular obstruction from microthrombi, OA, or hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction limit access of the thermal indicator to the entire extravascular compartment. Additionally, we report baseline EVLW of 10-11 mLÁkg -1 , significantly greater than the reported normal range of 3-7 mLÁkg -1 , 27 suggesting that EVLW may also be overestimated at baseline in this model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the absence of cardiac dysfunction, EVLW is a good indicator of noncardiogenic pulmonary edema earlier and more sensitive than other parameters such as chest x-ray or OI (17). It has been validated against the gold-standard gravimetric method in animal models and the in vivo double indicator technique (18,19). Interestingly, EVLW is increased in patients suffering from stroke (6) or intracranial trauma (20).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bolus transpulmonary thermodilution measurements are required for the estimation of these haemodynamic and pulmonary variables using the PiCCO. Several studies have investigated the accuracy of these values [17,[20][21][22]], but few have described the precision of this technique [23,24]. Accuracy refers to how close a measurement is to the actual or real value, and precision refers to how close repeated measurements are to each other [25].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%