2019
DOI: 10.1186/s12711-018-0443-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of imputation to whole-genome sequence in sheep

Abstract: BackgroundThe use of whole-genome sequence (WGS) data for genomic prediction and association studies is highly desirable because the causal mutations should be present in the data. The sequencing of 935 sheep from a range of breeds provides the opportunity to impute sheep genotyped with single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays to WGS. This study evaluated the accuracy of imputation from SNP genotypes to WGS using this reference population of 935 sequenced sheep.ResultsThe accuracy of imputation from the Ovi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
59
4
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
6
59
4
2
Order By: Relevance
“…4), and thus implies that an imputation error would have a major impact on the final correlation. Nonetheless, the correlations that we obtained even for high MAF were low in comparison with other studies in livestock [3,29,30] or humans [31] where the correlation between true and imputed genotypes could reach 0.8. As our imputation study involved very few sequenced individuals (33 and 40), a single imputation error would drastically reduce this correlation.…”
Section: Imputation Qualitycontrasting
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4), and thus implies that an imputation error would have a major impact on the final correlation. Nonetheless, the correlations that we obtained even for high MAF were low in comparison with other studies in livestock [3,29,30] or humans [31] where the correlation between true and imputed genotypes could reach 0.8. As our imputation study involved very few sequenced individuals (33 and 40), a single imputation error would drastically reduce this correlation.…”
Section: Imputation Qualitycontrasting
confidence: 95%
“…When possible, imputation to a whole-genome sequence is performed in a stepwise manner starting with the lowest density panel, before moving on to a medium density chip, then a highdensity chip and finally imputation to sequence level. In dairy cattle and sheep, this method has proved more efficient than direct imputation from lowest density to sequence [2,3]. In goats, the only genotyping tool available is a 50 k-chip (Illumina GoatSNP50 BeadChip) [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be linked to the small number of variants with a high MAF (Figure 4), and thus implies that an imputation error would have a major impact on the final correlation. Nonetheless, the correlations that we obtained even for high MAF were low in comparison with other studies in livestock [3,30,31] or humans [32] where the correlation between true and imputed genotypes could reach 0.8. As our imputation study involved very few sequenced individuals (33 and 40), a single imputation error would drastically reduce this correlation.…”
Section: Imputation Qualitycontrasting
confidence: 95%
“…When possible, imputation to a whole-genome sequence is performed in a stepwise manner starting with the lowest density panel, before moving on to a medium density chip, then a high-density chip and finally imputation to sequence level. In dairy cattle and sheep, this method has proved more efficient than direct imputation from lowest density to sequence [2,3]. In goats, the only genotyping tool available is a 50k-chip (Illumina GoatSNP50…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…QuAdTrim was first developed in 2011 for use in a metagenomic study that utilised Illumina paired end sequence data (Ross, et al, 2012). Subsequently QuAdTrim has been used for quality control of Illumina sequence data in from human, bacterial, virus, cattle, sheep, and salmon studies amoung others (Bolormaa, et al, 2019;Daetwyler, et al, 2017;Kamato, et al, 2017;Kijas, et al, 2019;Kijas, et al, 2018;Wei, et al, 2018).…”
Section: History Usage and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%