2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2021.07.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Diagnosing Pediatric Cardiac Masses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(1) disruption of neighboring tissue and extension of the mass across the pericardium into myocardium, with interruption of epicardial and endocardial contours, (2) increased thickness in comparison with the adjacent myocardial segments, determining hypo/dys/akinesia of a focal myocardial area compared with closest cardiac segments in absence of coronary distribution that could lead to the suspicion of ischemic etiology), (3) mass tissue characterization as defined by qualitative intensity pattern (hypointense, isointense, or hyperintense as compared with normal myocardium) and signal intensity ratio, defined as the signal intensity of the mass relative to the adjacent, uninvolved myocardium, 11,21 presence or absence of contrast first-pass perfusion, EGE or LGE in the mass, (4) presence and severity of pericardial effusion. Case examples are provided in Figure 1.…”
Section: Cardiac Magnetic Resonancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(1) disruption of neighboring tissue and extension of the mass across the pericardium into myocardium, with interruption of epicardial and endocardial contours, (2) increased thickness in comparison with the adjacent myocardial segments, determining hypo/dys/akinesia of a focal myocardial area compared with closest cardiac segments in absence of coronary distribution that could lead to the suspicion of ischemic etiology), (3) mass tissue characterization as defined by qualitative intensity pattern (hypointense, isointense, or hyperintense as compared with normal myocardium) and signal intensity ratio, defined as the signal intensity of the mass relative to the adjacent, uninvolved myocardium, 11,21 presence or absence of contrast first-pass perfusion, EGE or LGE in the mass, (4) presence and severity of pericardial effusion. Case examples are provided in Figure 1.…”
Section: Cardiac Magnetic Resonancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with echocardiography, CMR allows for high spatial resolution and multiplanar imaging, comprehensively characterizing mass morphology, tissue characterization, blood perfusion, and extracardiac findings. [11][12][13] Several studies have reported a remarkable accuracy of CMR in CMs characterization compared with histology. 12,14,15 However, they are limited due to the small sample size, the underrepresentation of some CMs histotypes, and the lack of a direct comparison between echocardiography and CMR.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have a case of myxofibrosarcoma with multiple metastases soon after surgical resection mimicking myxoma both preoperatively and intraoperatively ( Supplementary Figure 3 ). It may be difficult to differentiate myxomas from malignant tumors or thrombus preoperatively ( 26 , 27 ). PET imaging is sensitive in ruling out malignant tumors, which is costly ( 28 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, CMR is the hottest topic in cardiac mass research. Several retrospective studies have shown that the CMR features demonstrate excellent accuracy for the differentiation of cardiac thrombi from tumors and can be helpful for the distinction of benign and malignant neoplasms (24,(30)(31)(32)(33)(34). A prospective CMR study has demonstrated that tumor size (>3.25 cm), invasion, and first-pass perfusion are useful imaging characteristics in differentiating benign from malignant tumors (35).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%