2011 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS) 2011
DOI: 10.1109/infcomw.2011.5928788
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accountable MapReduce in cloud computing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Accountability in operating system was proposed and studied in [2,55]. Accountability for cloud computing was proposed and studied in [39,40,70,80]. Accountability for smart grids was proposed and studied in [71,72,73,74].…”
Section: Secure and Accountable Internetmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Accountability in operating system was proposed and studied in [2,55]. Accountability for cloud computing was proposed and studied in [39,40,70,80]. Accountability for smart grids was proposed and studied in [71,72,73,74].…”
Section: Secure and Accountable Internetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The papers [33,34] use Emulab to study 4D future Internet. The papers [39][40] use Emulab to study MapReduce for cloud computing. The papers [41,42] use Emulab to study building global view with log files.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Yongzhi Wang and his colleagues introduced the verifier role in the MapReduce computing model [10], which samples and re-computes the results passed the replication verification, to defend collusion attack. Z. Xiao et al used a set of trusted auditing nodes to record the results generated by various phases of MapReduce [20]. The cheating nodes can be located by re-computing the results.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Xiao et al [4] presented an accountable MapReduce platform which checks all working machines and detects malicious nodes in real time. By replaying the tasks executed by workers and matching output with the original results, auditors are able to generate verifiable evidence once inconsistency occurs.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%