2011
DOI: 10.1080/12265934.2011.635879
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accommodating flexible daily temporal constraint on a continuous choice model of departure time for urban shopping travel

Abstract: This paper attempts to propose departure time choice model of travellers for oneday shopping travel based on the consideration of the availability of flexible temporal constraint during noon until evening, namely praying time. The model assumes that travellers decide their departure time to minimize the disutility of shortage stay time at the shopping centre, disutility of lateness home arrival time, and disutility of the flexible daily temporal constraint. It is applied to urban shopping travellers on the bas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(27 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All this means that, in some areas, these detailed databases are not available or updated. This lack of reliable or specific (non-work related travel) information (mainly in rural areas), which has been argued in abundant studies, has forced scholars to use other ways to collect information different than the household travel surveys (such as internet survey techniques as employed by Bernard, Kostelecký, & Patočková, 2014;Verhoeven, Arentze, Timmermans, & van der Waerden, 2007, or interview surveys as Brown & O'Hara, 2003;or Ramli, Oeda, Sumi, & Matsunaga, 2011; or a combination of both as Sioui, Morency, & Trapanier, 2013) and to limit their analyses to a few number of surveys and places. Overall, as in many similar mobility studies (see Appendix 1), to collect information about the commuting 15 and business 16 travel patterns of the CLM working population, the data were based on two original surveys.…”
Section: Sampling and Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All this means that, in some areas, these detailed databases are not available or updated. This lack of reliable or specific (non-work related travel) information (mainly in rural areas), which has been argued in abundant studies, has forced scholars to use other ways to collect information different than the household travel surveys (such as internet survey techniques as employed by Bernard, Kostelecký, & Patočková, 2014;Verhoeven, Arentze, Timmermans, & van der Waerden, 2007, or interview surveys as Brown & O'Hara, 2003;or Ramli, Oeda, Sumi, & Matsunaga, 2011; or a combination of both as Sioui, Morency, & Trapanier, 2013) and to limit their analyses to a few number of surveys and places. Overall, as in many similar mobility studies (see Appendix 1), to collect information about the commuting 15 and business 16 travel patterns of the CLM working population, the data were based on two original surveys.…”
Section: Sampling and Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The paper therefore analyzes only the trips for non-work and flexible activities including shopping, personal business, and leisure, recreation, and visiting relatives. These trips tend to be determined and implemented in-between or after the fixed, mandatory activities that affect the choice of flexible activities (Ramli et al, 2011). The rapid increase of singleperson households also affects the choice of leisure and shopping trips as well as trip frequency and transport modes (Fan et al, 2010).…”
Section: Travel Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shopping trip has big proportion for urban trips, especially during peak period. The journey has more individual temporal flexibility than travel journeys and provides more congestion and some types of environmental problems in the downtown zone [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%