1985
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a079465
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accident Dosimetry Using the TL from Dental Restoration Porcelains

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fading is a disadvantage of these materials similarly to those described by Majborn (1983), Mauricio et al (1985), and Godfrey-Smith and Haskell (1993). This problem can be overcome by using a fading calibration curve for each type of such materials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fading is a disadvantage of these materials similarly to those described by Majborn (1983), Mauricio et al (1985), and Godfrey-Smith and Haskell (1993). This problem can be overcome by using a fading calibration curve for each type of such materials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Ceramic construction materials such -as bricks and roof tiles are routinely used for reconstruction of accident dose using thermoluminescence (TL) (Maruyama et al, 1987;Haskell, 1993;Hiitt et a1.,, 1993). Promising results for TL reconstruction have been obtained also using watch jewels (Majborn, 1983) and dental restoration porcelains (Mauricio et al, 1985).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, identification of the type of dental ceramic can be complicated due to the great variety of dental ceramics used in practice (Veronese et al, 2010). For initial orientation, the TLD curve should be read and compared with already published data (Veronese et al, 2010;Bailiff et al, 2002;Mauricio et al, 1985;Ekendahl et al, 2013). While alumina resistors and dental ceramics usually enable only measurement of higher doses (>0.1 Gy) Ekendahl et al, 2013), the minimum detectable dose for salt is only a few mGy (Bernhardsson et al, 2009;Ekendahl and Judas, 2011).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%