2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2004.10.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acceptability, reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Turkish version of WOMAC osteoarthritis index

Abstract: The Turkish WOMAC OA index is acceptable, valid, reliable and responsive for use in Turkish patients with knee OA.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
131
0
12

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 276 publications
(162 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(26 reference statements)
0
131
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…We might have used another selfadministered instrument in the current study to gain additional insight for assessment of validity, which could be considered a limitation of our study. The WOMAC index, which has been adapted to Turkish, could have been used for this purpose [22]. The adapted version of this test is reportedly reliable and valid for patients with OA, but it takes longer to complete than the KOS-ADLS, and mostly is preferred for patients with OA and not for patients with other disorders, such as PFP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We might have used another selfadministered instrument in the current study to gain additional insight for assessment of validity, which could be considered a limitation of our study. The WOMAC index, which has been adapted to Turkish, could have been used for this purpose [22]. The adapted version of this test is reportedly reliable and valid for patients with OA, but it takes longer to complete than the KOS-ADLS, and mostly is preferred for patients with OA and not for patients with other disorders, such as PFP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Timed performance tests have been found to decrease significantly with mobility impairments (23)(24)(25)(26)(29)(30)(31). Residential status and physical mobility status have been determined to be significant predictors of timed performance (27)(28)(29).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result is not surprising, because the knee joint is more stable comparing to hip joint. Generally, THR patients were not allowed to per- Timed tests such as TUG and SST, indicate that patients after TKR and THR take longer to complete these tasks compared with controls of similar age (23,26,29). There is evidence that, although patients do experience recovery and improvement in strength and functional performance after THR surgery, mobility difficulties and functional deficits remain (31).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We evaluated the presence of knee joint medial and lateral tenderness, and inflammatory findings. We measured pain threshold at medial joint space with pressure algometer (Wagner Pain Test™ Model FPK [7].…”
Section: Patients and Clinical Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%