2009
DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/syp027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accelerated Species Inventory on Madagascar Using Coalescent-Based Models of Species Delineation

Abstract: High-throughput DNA sequencing has the potential to accelerate species discovery if it is able to recognize evolutionary entities from sequence data that are comparable to species. The general mixed Yule-coalescent (GMYC) model estimates the species boundary from DNA surveys by identifying independently evolving lineages as a transition from coalescent to speciation branching patterns on a phylogenetic tree. Applied here to 12 families from 4 orders of insects in Madagascar, we used the model to delineate 370 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
681
1
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 662 publications
(695 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
11
681
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The K2P model was chosen to facilitate comparison of our genetic distance data with previously published reports. We also estimated the number of lineages or evolutionary "entities" using a likelihoodbased analysis of a GMYC model that assumes an ultrametric gene genealogy and identifies the points of transition between within-population rates of coalescence versus interspecific rates of lineage coalescence (47,48). Using the code gmyc (47), written for R (69), a likelihood ratio test of a single-threshold model versus a multiple-threshold model rejected the former (χ 2 9 = 1956.236, P < 10 −10 ), inferring four transition points and 112 entities including 60 clusters of more than one sample.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The K2P model was chosen to facilitate comparison of our genetic distance data with previously published reports. We also estimated the number of lineages or evolutionary "entities" using a likelihoodbased analysis of a GMYC model that assumes an ultrametric gene genealogy and identifies the points of transition between within-population rates of coalescence versus interspecific rates of lineage coalescence (47,48). Using the code gmyc (47), written for R (69), a likelihood ratio test of a single-threshold model versus a multiple-threshold model rejected the former (χ 2 9 = 1956.236, P < 10 −10 ), inferring four transition points and 112 entities including 60 clusters of more than one sample.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). Application of a general mixed Yule coalescent (GMYC) model-based approach to identifying discrete evolutionary clusters (47,48) yielded an additional 40 "entities" beyond the 74 identified by the bivariate barcode gap analysis. The restricted geographic sampling in our study, however, could be hampering the GMYC analysis (49,50), and we therefore prefer the more conservative estimate of 74 total species named and candidate.…”
Section: Sevenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Field identifications were used to maximize the diversity and to obtain a good representation of the total variation, but these identifications were not further utilized. Hence the data reflect the evolutionary history of the target taxa as inferred from a single locus, but any inconsistencies that may result from gene tree-species tree incongruence presumably are avoided due to the very large number of lineages sampled and the relatively rare occurrence of incongruence 25 . Note that with only the mtDNA sequenced, gene tree incongruence could only be assessed indirectly against the morphological species limits; where such incongruence with the mtDNA groups was evident, this usually affected only some portions of the species ranges 26 , that is, any resulting error would affect the details of geographic turnover but not the discovery of species-level groups per se.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our GMYC analyses were performed with the consensus tree under the single-threshold model, using the R package SPLITS (Monaghan et al, 2009). The genealogical sorting index (gsi) statistic quantifies the degree of exclusive ancestry of pre-defined groups on a phylogenetic tree (Cummings et al, 2008).…”
Section: Partitionmentioning
confidence: 99%