2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.cclet.2022.107885
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accelerated discovery of novel high-performance zinc-ion battery cathode materials by combining high-throughput screening and experiments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Zn diffusion barrier for monolayer Ti 3 C 2 is 0.19 eV, which is close to the value for bilayer Ti 0.75 V 0.75 Cr 0.75 Mo 0.75 C 2 . The lowest barrier of 0.18 eV for Ti 0.75 V 0.75 Cr 0.75 Mo 0.75 C 2 , which is comparable with those of 2D α-CP and porous phosphorene (0.11–0.22 eV) , and superior to C 2 N (0.24–1 eV), TiS 2 (0.333 eV), TiSe 2 (0.338 eV), and h-AlC (0.41–1.21 eV) in Table ,,, and is also smaller than those of graphene (0.54 eV), δ-MnO 2 (0.63 eV), and Mg 2 MnO 4 (0.455 eV), ,, reveals that Ti 0.75 V 0.75 Cr 0.75 Mo 0.75 C 2 nanosheets can realize fast adsorption/desorption kinetics processes and high charge/discharge rates for anode applications in zinc-ion batteries.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The Zn diffusion barrier for monolayer Ti 3 C 2 is 0.19 eV, which is close to the value for bilayer Ti 0.75 V 0.75 Cr 0.75 Mo 0.75 C 2 . The lowest barrier of 0.18 eV for Ti 0.75 V 0.75 Cr 0.75 Mo 0.75 C 2 , which is comparable with those of 2D α-CP and porous phosphorene (0.11–0.22 eV) , and superior to C 2 N (0.24–1 eV), TiS 2 (0.333 eV), TiSe 2 (0.338 eV), and h-AlC (0.41–1.21 eV) in Table ,,, and is also smaller than those of graphene (0.54 eV), δ-MnO 2 (0.63 eV), and Mg 2 MnO 4 (0.455 eV), ,, reveals that Ti 0.75 V 0.75 Cr 0.75 Mo 0.75 C 2 nanosheets can realize fast adsorption/desorption kinetics processes and high charge/discharge rates for anode applications in zinc-ion batteries.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…When the adsorbed number of Zn atoms is 24, the calculated OCV value of the Ti 0.75 V 0.75 Cr 0.75 Mo 0.75 C 2 bilayer with Zn 2+ saturation is 0.23 V. The average OCV values for bilayer Ti 0.75 V 0.75 Cr 0.75 Mo 0.75 C 2 and Ti 3 C 2 are 0.63 and 0.54 V, respectively. Table exhibits the comparison of average OCVs, theoretical capacities, and diffusion energy barriers of some 2D anode materials for metal-ion batteries. , , The average OCV of bilayer Ti 0.75 V 0.75 Cr 0.75 Mo 0.75 C 2 is comparable with the values of 2D Mo 2 CrC 2 ,V 3 C 2 , Cr 3 C 2 , VHfMoC 2 (0.18–0.8 V), and C 2 N (0.26–1.40 V) ,, in Table and is larger than other recent studies of 2D TiS 2 (∼0.3 V), TiSe 2 (∼0.1 V), α-BNP 2 (0.58 V), Mg 2 MnO 4 (0.6 V), and PC 6 (0.23 V). , These results reveal the excellent performance of Ti 0.75 V 0.75 Cr 0.75 Mo 0.75 C 2 nanosheets as an anode material with suitable electric potential for zinc-ion batteries.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hence, E a serves as an evaluation indicator for the desolvation effect of Zn 2+ on the Zn anode . It can be determined by fitting the obtained charge transfer resistance ( R ct ) data according to the Arrhenius equation 1 R ct = A exp true( prefix− E normala R T true) where A is the pre-exponential factor, T is the absolute temperature (K), R ct is the charge transfer resistance, and R is the standard gas constant (8.314 J mol –1 K –1 ). The desolvation energy values of Zn 2+ in the Glu-contianing electrolyte (35.63 kJ mol –1 ) and the Asp-containing electrolyte (39.22 kJ mol –1 ) are higher than that in the 2 M ZnSO 4 electrolyte (25.20 kJ mol –1 ) (Figure c).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, E a serves as an evaluation indicator for the desolvation effect of Zn 2+ on the Zn anode. 37 It can be determined by fitting the obtained charge transfer resistance (R ct ) data according to the Arrhenius equation 38 = i k j j j y…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%