2018
DOI: 10.1080/00221546.2018.1441107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Academic Engagement and Student Success: Do High-Impact Practices Mean Higher Graduation Rates?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
51
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
4
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, Johnson and Stage [8] have shown that practices labeled as "high-impact practices" in higher education, such as participation in first-year seminars, being part of a learning community or service learning, may not be enough to positively predict graduation rates, although a first-year seminar "may have longer-term impacts that are more difficult to measure than grades or retention" [8] (p. 4). Among other contributing factors, relationships with adults (parents and teachers), family's expectations, support and involvement, peer support, alongside socioeconomic status, have proven to be relevant predictors of engagement, persistence in school, and degree attainment [14][15][16][17][18][19][20], thus stressing the importance of outside-institution [20][21][22][23][24], contextual factors for student retention.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Johnson and Stage [8] have shown that practices labeled as "high-impact practices" in higher education, such as participation in first-year seminars, being part of a learning community or service learning, may not be enough to positively predict graduation rates, although a first-year seminar "may have longer-term impacts that are more difficult to measure than grades or retention" [8] (p. 4). Among other contributing factors, relationships with adults (parents and teachers), family's expectations, support and involvement, peer support, alongside socioeconomic status, have proven to be relevant predictors of engagement, persistence in school, and degree attainment [14][15][16][17][18][19][20], thus stressing the importance of outside-institution [20][21][22][23][24], contextual factors for student retention.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, Culver and Bowman ( 2020 ) find no effect of first-year seminars on retention or four-year graduation. Johnson and Stage ( 2018 ) find little to no impact of so-called high-impact practices on 4-year or 6-year graduation rates at four-year public institutions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent study on student success and HIPs suggested that graduation rates at universities were not associated with experiential activities such as HIPs. Authors used analyses of institutional data (Johnson and Stage 2018). While that informed the field with helpful information using aggregate data, this study measured the impact of HIPs on the skill development of participating students.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A doption of high‐impact prac tices (HIPs) within institutions of higher education has grown over the last decade, and their widespread use suggests that their inclusion has become a mainstay (Johnson and Stage 2018; Kinzie 2012). Research into this general collection of experiential activities, which George Kuh termed “HIPs,” suggests that students derive positive benefits from involvement in terms of student learning (“what students know and can do”) and that higher levels of engagement occurred in students participating in HIPs (Kuh 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%