Applied Underwater Acoustics 2017
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-811240-3.00004-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Absorption of Sound in Seawater

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Actually, our design considers only a 70 mm distance from the transmitter to receiver, yet, significant drops are found in SPL, APF and receiver displacements. Hence, higher energy density will be required for a longer distance (>100 m) underwater [16,17]. This reason supports the KHz range frequencies for underwater wireless power transfer [18].…”
Section: Acoustic Pressure Fieldmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Actually, our design considers only a 70 mm distance from the transmitter to receiver, yet, significant drops are found in SPL, APF and receiver displacements. Hence, higher energy density will be required for a longer distance (>100 m) underwater [16,17]. This reason supports the KHz range frequencies for underwater wireless power transfer [18].…”
Section: Acoustic Pressure Fieldmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…В работе Neighbors (2017) [45] обсуждается поглощение звука в зависимости от таких факторов как соленость, температура, водородный показатель и давление. Обсуждаются экспериментальные результаты, полученные за несколько десятилетий.…”
Section: основные этапы исследований поглощения звукаunclassified
“…The high frequency sonars traditionally used by AUVs can be within the hearing thresholds of cetaceans categorised in the HF / VHF hearing groups by Southall et al (2019). These high frequency sonars are unlikely to cause as widespread ensonification of the water column as MFAS due to the comparatively fast absorption rates of high frequency sounds in water (Neighbors, 2017). This absorption causes more significant propagation loss than for less readily absorbed lower frequency sounds.…”
Section: Sonar Risk Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%