2005
DOI: 10.1086/432670
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Absolute Calibration of the Infrared Array Camera on theSpitzer Space Telescope

Abstract: The Infrared Array Camera (IRAC) on the Spitzer Space Telescope is absolutely calibrated by comparing photometry of a set of A stars near the north ecliptic pole to predictions based on ground-based observations and a stellar atmosphere model. The brightness of point sources is calibrated to an accuracy of 3%, relative to models for A-star stellar atmospheres, for observations performed and analyzed in the same manner as for the calibration stars. This includes corrections for the location of the star in the a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
367
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 559 publications
(378 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
11
367
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A systematic offset between A-type and K-M type giant standard stars is reported by Reach et al (2005) for the calibration of the IRAC on Spitzer. We have only three A-type standard stars in our calibration for the 9 μm band and no A-type stars are used for the calibration of the 18 μm band due to the detection limit.…”
Section: Flux Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A systematic offset between A-type and K-M type giant standard stars is reported by Reach et al (2005) for the calibration of the IRAC on Spitzer. We have only three A-type standard stars in our calibration for the 9 μm band and no A-type stars are used for the calibration of the 18 μm band due to the detection limit.…”
Section: Flux Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The conversion function from electrons to Jy is derived statistically by comparing the model fluxes with the measurements of hundreds of standard stars. The standard stars are selected from the infrared standard star network consisting of K-and Mgiants (Cohen et al 1999) and additional faint standard stars located around the north and south ecliptic poles (Reach et al 2005;Ishihara et al 2006b), which have a high visibility for the AKARI survey. The expected fluxes ( f quoted λ (λ i )) of the standard stars at the effective wavelengths (9 μm and 18 μm) are calculated for the incident spectrum of f λ ∝ λ −1 by convolving the model spectra of the standard stars ( f λ (λ)) with the relative spectral response curves (R i ) in electron units as…”
Section: Flux Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean-weighted magnitudes were calculated for targets in which multiepoch observations are reported. Magnitudes were converted into flux densities using the zero-points of 281 ± 4 Jy, 180 ± 3 Jy, 115 ± 2 Jy and 65 ± 1 Jy at 3.6, 4.5, 5.8 and 8.0 µm respectively (Reach et al 2005), and 7.2 ± 0.1 Jy at 24 µm ). Additionally, the Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE) All-Sky Data Release (Cutri & et al 2012) was used to extract photometry for all targets measured in the four WISE channels.…”
Section: Construction Of Spectral Energy Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the infrared (IR) observations are affected by systematic effects that may compromise the measurements because these effects induce flux variations comparable to the depth of a planetary transit. For example, the 3.6 and 4.5 μm Spitzer/IRAC channels (InSb detectors) are affected by the pixel-phase effect (Reach et al 2005;Charbonneau et al 2005;MoralesCalderón et al 2006;Knutson et al 2008) due to the telescope jitter and intra-pixel variation in the sensitivity of the detector, which may cause a flux peak-to-peak amplitude of up to ∼1% (Beaulieu et al 2008;Hébrard et al 2010) or even higher (Désert et al 2011b;Fressin et al 2011), according to the exposure time. The light curves of the 5.8 and 8.0 μm channels (Si:As detectors) follow non-linear trends with time, called the ramp effect Knutson et al 2007a), caused by the trapping of electrons by the detector impurities (see Agol et al 2010 for further details), which produce mmag level flux variations in photometry.…”
Section: Influence Of Stellar Activity On Stellar Colours and The Chamentioning
confidence: 99%