Abrasive fine-finishing technology

Hashimoto, Fukuo; Yamaguchi, Hitomi; Krajnik, Peter; Wegener, Konrad; Chaudhari, Rahul; Hoffmeister, Hans‐Werner; Kuster, Friedrich

doi:10.1016/j.cirp.2016.06.003

Cited by 186 publications

(90 citation statements)

References 129 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Hashimoto et al [2] described a wide range of commonly used abrasive nenishing processes in their recent article with a signicant number of sources. In general, these processes can also be applied in robotic applications.…”

Section: From Manual To Robotic Surface Nishingmentioning

confidence: 99%

A survey of telerobotic surface finishing

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This is a survey of research published on the subjects of telerobotics, haptic feedback, and mixed reality applied to surface nishing. The survey especially focuses on how visuo-haptic feedback can be used to improve a grinding process using a remote manipulator or robot. The bene ts of teleoperation and reasons for using haptic feedback are presented. The use of genetic algorithms for optimizing haptic sensing is brie y discussed. Ways of augmenting the operator's vision are described. Visual feedback can be used to nd defects and analyze the quality of the surface resulting from the surface nishing process. Visual cues can also be used to aid a human operator in manipulating a robot precisely and avoiding collisions.

show abstract

Section: From Manual To Robotic Surface Nishingmentioning

confidence: 99%

A survey of telerobotic surface finishing

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The tool and the process parameters, causing different material removal mechanisms, influence the resulting surface characteristics roughness and bearing area ratio [6,7,10,11]. When considering previous models the material removal mechanisms in microfinishing processes can be assumed as an interaction of the tribological wear mechanisms microcracking, microfatigue, and the mechanisms microridging, microploughing, and microcutting in analogy to longitudinal stroke honing processes [5,[12][13][14][15].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…When compared to grinding tools the grain types diamond, corundum, and silicium-oxide are the same, whereas the grain size is typically smaller [3,4,6]. Usually, microfinishing films have a maximum grain size of d K = 125 µm, whereas the minimum grain size is d K ≤ 1 µm [5][6][7][8].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Therefore, surface structuring is relevant for process engineering and the development of machining processes [1][2][3]. Honing processes, e.g., microfinishing, are often used to produce technical surfaces focusing their tribological functions [3][4][5][6][7]. As a last step in the process chain, microfinishing is mainly used to generate surfaces, which improves the tribological contact situation without changing deviations of the shape or geometry [8].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Structuring Surfaces by Microfinishing Using Defined Abrasive Belts

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Microfinishing, also known as superfinishing or short-stroke honing, is a commonly used process for generating technical surfaces focusing on tribological applications. Due to microfinishing processes high surface qualities are manufacturable regarding the surface roughness and bearing area ratio. While the required characteristics for tribological loaded workpieces are changing with their rising significance, the surface structuring is becoming more and more important. With the use of defined abrasive belts, the possibilities of surface structuring by microfinishing are enhanced. The possibilities and challenges concerning surface structuring by microfinishing applying defined abrasive belts are described in this research study. Therefore, a geometrical-kinematic simulation is used to predict the theoretical structures generated by microfinishing, while in experimental investigations the influences of kinematic parameters and a multi-stage process sequence are considered.

show abstract

“…Therefore, the finishing operation is more and more important in the whole production process. Among the many precision machining methods, magnetic abrasive finishing (MAF) is undoubtedly proven to be an effective precision processing method [1][2][3][4]. Though the MAF process, as a kind of ultra-precision machining method, can achieve nanoscale surface finishing, the polishing efficiency decreases when a hard metal surface is polished by the MAF process, as compared to other processing methods [5][6][7].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Study on Electrolytic Magnetic Abrasive Finishing for Finishing Stainless Steel SUS304 Plane with a Special Compound Machining Tool

Sun

Zou

2018

JMMP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:In order to improve the finishing efficiency of traditional plane magnetic abrasive finishing (MAF), we have previously proposed an effective plane MAF process combined with an electrolytic process and developed a special compound machining tool for the electrolytic magnetic abrasive finishing (EMAF). In this research, the EMAF process is divided into two finishing steps. The first finishing step is the EMAF step, and a single MAF step constitutes the second finishing step. The machinability of SUS304 material can be improved through the formation of passive films from the electrolytic process in the EMAF step. Meanwhile, the passive films can be rapidly and easily removed by friction between the magnetic particles and the workpiece-generated mechanical machining force. Thus, the surface finishing efficiency can be greatly improved. Compared with a dedicated MAF machining tool or a dedicated electrolytic machining tool, this special compound machining tool can synchronously achieve MAF and electrolytic processes to make the processing more convenient. This study focuses on exploring mechanical finishing characteristics of the special compound machining tool through MAF experiments. Additionally, EMAF experiments are conducted under the optimal mechanical finishing conditions. The experimental results of the EMAF process show that the surface roughness R a can be reduced to less than 30 nm at the 4-min EMAF step, and it can be further reduced to 20 nm at the 10-min MAF step.

show abstract

Abrasive fine-finishing technology

Cited by 186 publications

References 129 publications

A survey of telerobotic surface finishing

A survey of telerobotic surface finishing

Structuring Surfaces by Microfinishing Using Defined Abrasive Belts

Study on Electrolytic Magnetic Abrasive Finishing for Finishing Stainless Steel SUS304 Plane with a Special Compound Machining Tool

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About