1983
|
Sign up to set email alerts
Abnormalities of visual evoked potentials by checkerboards in children with specific reading disability
Search citation statements
Order By: Relevance
Paper Sections
Select...
20
1
0
0
Citation Types
0
4
0
0
Year Published
Range
1986
19862023
2023Publication Types
Select...
12
9
Relationship
0
21
Authors
Journals
Cited by 21 publications
(4 citation statements)
References 22 publications
0
4
0
0
Order By: Relevance
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“……”
Section: Do Srds With Visual Deficits Also Have Phonological Coding D
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“……”
Section: Do Srds With Visual Deficits Also Have Phonological Coding D
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“……”
Section: Do Srds With Visual Deficits Also Have Phonological Coding D
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“……”
Section: Do Srds With Visual Deficits Also Have Phonological Coding D
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“……”
Section: Do Srds With Visual Deficits Also Have Phonological Coding D
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“……”
Section: Do Srds With Visual Deficits Also Have Phonological Coding D
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…In fact, few VEP studies have used optimal stimuli to dissociate the M and P pathway responses. For example, most studies used checkerboard patterns to activate responses from a wide range of spatial frequency mechanisms that are not restricted to the magnocellular pathway [39,[59][60][61]. Moreover, the majority of studies based their conclusions on inductive reasoning, either because they used stimulus conditions that tested only one pathway (either M or P), or they used paradigms constructed from a theoretical rationale based on animal studies that have not been validated in humans.…”
Section: Introduction
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“……”
Section: Do Srds With Visual Deficits Also Have Phonological Coding D
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“……”
Section: Do Srds With Visual Deficits Also Have Phonological Coding D
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“……”
Section: Do Srds With Visual Deficits Also Have Phonological Coding D
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…In fact, few VEP studies have used optimal stimuli to dissociate the M and P pathway responses. For example, most studies used checkerboard patterns to activate responses from a wide range of spatial frequency mechanisms that are not restricted to the magnocellular pathway [39,[59][60][61]. Moreover, the majority of studies based their conclusions on inductive reasoning, either because they used stimulus conditions that tested only one pathway (either M or P), or they used paradigms constructed from a theoretical rationale based on animal studies that have not been validated in humans.…”
Section: Introduction
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“……”
Section: Do Srds With Visual Deficits Also Have Phonological Coding D
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“……”
Section: Do Srds With Visual Deficits Also Have Phonological Coding D
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“……”
Section: Do Srds With Visual Deficits Also Have Phonological Coding D
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…In fact, few VEP studies have used optimal stimuli to dissociate the M and P pathway responses. For example, most studies used checkerboard patterns to activate responses from a wide range of spatial frequency mechanisms that are not restricted to the magnocellular pathway [39,[59][60][61]. Moreover, the majority of studies based their conclusions on inductive reasoning, either because they used stimulus conditions that tested only one pathway (either M or P), or they used paradigms constructed from a theoretical rationale based on animal studies that have not been validated in humans.…”
Section: Introduction
mentioning
confidence: 99%