2017 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/icip.2017.8296547
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abnormal event detection in videos using generative adversarial nets

Abstract: In this paper we address the abnormality detection problem in crowded scenes. We propose to use Generative Adversarial Nets (GANs), which are trained using normal frames and corresponding optical-flow images in order to learn an internal representation of the scene normality. Since our GANs are trained with only normal data, they are not able to generate abnormal events. At testing time the real data are compared with both the appearance and the motion representations reconstructed by our GANs and abnormal are… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
267
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 382 publications
(268 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
267
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Generative adversarial network based method. Deep learning through generative adversarial networks (GANs) for abnormal event detection was introduced by Ravanbakhsh et al [29]. GANs are used to learn and model normal crowd behaviour using unsupervised data.…”
Section: Deep Learning Based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Generative adversarial network based method. Deep learning through generative adversarial networks (GANs) for abnormal event detection was introduced by Ravanbakhsh et al [29]. GANs are used to learn and model normal crowd behaviour using unsupervised data.…”
Section: Deep Learning Based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is still a challenging problem due to two key factors. (i) The lack of large-scale annotated training data limits the performance of Deep Convolutional Neural Networks (DCNNs) [28,29]. (ii) The contentious definition of the term "abnormal" or "anomaly" causes significantly different solutions in different context (environment) [12,28,29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ped2 Conv-AE [11] 0.702 0.900 Discriminative learning [7] 0.783 -Hashing filters [54] -0.910 Unmask late fusion [16] 0.806 0.822 AMDN (double fusion) [51] -0.908 ConvLSTM-AE [27] 0.770 0.881 DeepAppearance [42] 0.846 -FRCN action [14] -0.922 TSC [28] 0.806 0.910 Stacked RNN [28] 0.817 0.922 AbnormalGAN [37] -0.935 GrowingGas [46] -0.941 Future frame prediction [25] 0.851 0.954 Our proposed method 0.869 0.962 Table 1. Frame-level performance (AUC) of anomaly detection on the CUHK Avenue and UCSD Ped2 datasets.…”
Section: Avenuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another approach, Ravanbakhsh et al [17] proposed to use the same training setup but instead of using the discriminators for detection they adapted the output of the generators. They use the difference between the generated sample and the ground truth for each channel to determine a measure for the abnormality.…”
Section: Anomaly Detection Using Gansmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the number of citations, this data set is the most used benchmark for anomaly detection in surveillance. However, as some recent work reports results for Ped1 on a subset of 16 test videos [17] whereas others report results for 36 videos [12], we decided to conduct our experiments on the Ped2 subset. The metric used for quantitative comparison is the area under the receiving operating characteristic (AUC).…”
Section: Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%