2012
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.85.061133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abelian Manna model in three dimensions and below

Abstract: The Abelian Manna model of self-organized criticality is studied on various three-dimensional and fractal lattices. The exponents for avalanche size, duration, and area distribution of the model are obtained by using a high-accuracy moment analysis. Together with earlier results on lower-dimensional lattices, the present results reinforce the notion of universality below the upper critical dimension and allow us to determine the coefficients of an ε expansion. By rescaling the critical exponents by the lattice… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
26
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
7
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tab. I shows a comparison between this result and the numerical values found by simulations [9,17,18] on lattices in dimensions d ∈ {1, 2, 3, 5}. While our estimate Eq.…”
Section: Critical Densitymentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Tab. I shows a comparison between this result and the numerical values found by simulations [9,17,18] on lattices in dimensions d ∈ {1, 2, 3, 5}. While our estimate Eq.…”
Section: Critical Densitymentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Numerical simulations have established that a range of other models belong to the same universality class [10, p. 178], in particular the Oslo Model [11,12] and the conserved lattice gas [13,14]. The stationary density of the AMM has been estimated with very high precision on hypercubic lattices of dimensions d = 1 to d = 5 [9,[15][16][17][18]. Yet, theoretical understanding of the Manna Model is far from complete.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is widely accepted that the BTW model has a multiscaling behaviour [16,17] due to its complete toppling balance [18] and positive auto-correlation in avalanche wave series [19,20], whereas the SSM does not show such correlation and consequently follows finite size scaling (FSS) ansatz. Recent numerical studies of the SSM have been carried out not only on various regular lattices of integer dimension but also on various kind of deterministic fractal lattices [21,22,23] and the results confirm the existence of robust FSS behaviour of the SSM across different regular, as well as fractal lattices though the universality class depends on the space or fractal dimension of these lattices. The fractal lattices considered for such studies were deterministic, the properties of SSM as well as BTW on random fractal lattices are yet to be studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Note that taking the measured values of the exponents the quantity D s (2 − τ s ) has the value 2.59 which is again within the error bar of the measured value of σ s (1). Recently, based on an extensive numerical study Huynh and Pruessner [22,23] proposed a relation among D s , d w and spatial dimension (d) as,…”
Section: Probability Distribution Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not only SSM shows robust scaling behaviour than the deterministic BTW model, it is also able to explain certain experimentally observed avalanche behaviour [22]. SSM found to be one of the most studied models in various dimensions in SOC literature [23,24,25]. However, there are not many studies that report the scaling behaviour of SSM on SWN.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%