2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.hedp.2019.100715
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ab-initio simulations of MgTiO3 oxide at different pressure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
4
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DOS calculations interpret the semiconducting behavior of three pristine structures depicting clear bandgaps as illustrated in Figure 4A‐C. Bandgap results of ATiO 3 listed in Table 3 are well consistent with previous DFT studies on electronic properties of ATiO 3, 44‐46,51,52 but are slightly less than experimentally reported values 52‐54,58 owing to underestimation of DFT calculations caused by discrepancy in GGA. To analyze the dependence of bandgap energies on atomic orbital geometry, we have also calculated the projected DOS (PDOS) of valence orbitals of each atom, and the outcomes are shown in same Figure 4A‐C.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…DOS calculations interpret the semiconducting behavior of three pristine structures depicting clear bandgaps as illustrated in Figure 4A‐C. Bandgap results of ATiO 3 listed in Table 3 are well consistent with previous DFT studies on electronic properties of ATiO 3, 44‐46,51,52 but are slightly less than experimentally reported values 52‐54,58 owing to underestimation of DFT calculations caused by discrepancy in GGA. To analyze the dependence of bandgap energies on atomic orbital geometry, we have also calculated the projected DOS (PDOS) of valence orbitals of each atom, and the outcomes are shown in same Figure 4A‐C.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Whereas B and B show bulk modulus and its pressure derivative, respectively 43 . Bulk modulus calculated in this study and tabulated as Table 1 is found well consistent with the available values in Reference 44–46. This confirms the validity of the theoretical model utilized in this work.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The peaks are noted at trueB 2.6 eV (3.7), trueD3.91 eV (7.9) for Rb 2 PdCl 6 and trueA 2.1 eV (2.9), trueC 3.7 eV (6.5) Rb 2 PdBr 6 the values are overestimated in small and depressed as compared to ε 2 ( ω ) due to density functional used here. Furthermore, external doping and pressure has been used in cubic systems 49‐51 to tune electronic and optical properties, same strategy would be effective in the studied materials as well.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No additional peaks corresponding to other compounds (for example Bi 2 O 3 ) were observed even for Bi concentration as high as 5 mol%, indicating that our synthesis method produced very stable STO:Bi powders. The crystallite size was calculated for each sample using the well-know Scherrer equation [25,44] and the diffraction peaks for each sample in Fig. 2a.…”
Section: Electrochemical Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%