2021
DOI: 10.1093/jalm/jfab020
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

AACC Guidance Document on Laboratory Investigation of Acute Kidney Injury

Abstract: Background Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a sudden episode of kidney damage or failure affecting up to 15% of hospitalized patients and is associated with serious short- and long-term complications, mortality, and health care costs. Current practices to diagnose and stage AKI are variable and do not factor in our improved understanding of the biological and analytical variability of creatinine. In addition, the emergence of biomarkers, for example, cystatin C, insulin-like growth factor binding… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In all RT-qPCR assays either detecting hRNase P, which served as an endogenous control for sample integrity and proper RNA extraction, Ct values obtained for samples taken by Q-tips were similar to those obtained by rayon swab 10 , while samples taken by flocked swab showed fewer copies. As recommended, flocked swabs are stored in 2 ml of saline after sampling and only 1/14 of the volume is used in the subsequent RT-qPCR assay.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…In all RT-qPCR assays either detecting hRNase P, which served as an endogenous control for sample integrity and proper RNA extraction, Ct values obtained for samples taken by Q-tips were similar to those obtained by rayon swab 10 , while samples taken by flocked swab showed fewer copies. As recommended, flocked swabs are stored in 2 ml of saline after sampling and only 1/14 of the volume is used in the subsequent RT-qPCR assay.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…1 , with a sharp rise in SCr at the lower range or renal function, our estimates regarding AKI and AKR, based on KDIGO criteria, might be somewhat skewed, amplifying projected changes in eGFR at the range of advanced renal dysfunction. Noteworthy, a new AACC Academy definition of AKI [ 31 ], based on biological variability data with strong clinical outcomes, states that a change of 20% should be more appropriate for the definition of AKI/AKR at SCr levels ≥1 mg/dL, whereas a change of ≥0.2 mg/dL should be used when SCr is < 1 mg/dL. This could prevent a substantial overestimation of AKI/AKR in patients with advanced CKD [ 32 ], questioning our conclusions regarding the 1.55 folds increase in the risk to develop AKI following radiocontrast-enhanced CT among patients with eGFR< 30 ml/min/1.73 m 2 .…”
Section: Limitations Of Our Studies Using Egfr As An Estimate Of Aki ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current KDIGO definition may increase diagnostic false-positives in patients with stable CKD because of inherent laboratory and biological variabilities of sCr [ 32 ]. A new recommendation is to use a 20% change to define AKI when the sCr value is >1 mg/dL, and it has been independently correlated with mortality [ 33 , 34 ]. In all AKI patients in the CKD group (13/95 patients, 22%), the sCr change (median, 42.3%) fulfilled this new recommendation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%