2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00704-016-1877-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A wind tunnel study of flows over idealised urban surfaces with roughness sublayer corrections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the examples is the TKE redistribution from vertical to spanwise components, resulting in decreasing anisotropy and turbulence scales [63,64]. While the RSL dynamics were examined in details in our previous study [65], such as the velocity profiles and length scale in RSL, this paper focuses on the practical significance of RSL particularly related to the street-level ventilation estimate.…”
Section: Street-level Ventilation Estimatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the examples is the TKE redistribution from vertical to spanwise components, resulting in decreasing anisotropy and turbulence scales [63,64]. While the RSL dynamics were examined in details in our previous study [65], such as the velocity profiles and length scale in RSL, this paper focuses on the practical significance of RSL particularly related to the street-level ventilation estimate.…”
Section: Street-level Ventilation Estimatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, each of the assumptions has its drawbacks. For applications in urban context especially at the nearground level, the log-law wind profile's validity is dubious, as the roughness of urban areas would significantly alter the atmospheric boundary layer's (ABL) layered structure which makes the log-law wind profile less accurate [1,2]. The power-law wind profile is an empirical assumption that describes the ground surface roughness's influence on the wind profile, of which the validity in describing the near-ground wind profile is also dubious.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%