2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.02.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Variational Bayesian inference method for parametric imaging of PET data

Abstract: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting galley proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. AbstractIn dynamic Positron Emissi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This formula associates the calculation of the posterior distribution of the factors specifying the data and the model (p(θ\y, m)) to the a priori distributions of the factors to be predicted (p(θ\m)). These distributions are acquired through the likelihood (p(y\θ, m)) and the probability density function, which defines the data specifying the factors and the model (Castellaro et al 2017). Model indication can be measured as a normalization constant for the product of the likelihood of the data and the prior probability of the factors.…”
Section: Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This formula associates the calculation of the posterior distribution of the factors specifying the data and the model (p(θ\y, m)) to the a priori distributions of the factors to be predicted (p(θ\m)). These distributions are acquired through the likelihood (p(y\θ, m)) and the probability density function, which defines the data specifying the factors and the model (Castellaro et al 2017). Model indication can be measured as a normalization constant for the product of the likelihood of the data and the prior probability of the factors.…”
Section: Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another study applied the variational Bayesian (VB) method to PET dataset for the first time (Castellaro et al 2017). VB was adjusted to the non-uniform noise distribution of the PET dataset.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the observed data Q and the parameter set Θ , which contains n independent model parameters, Θ 1 ,Θ 2 ...Θ n , the posterior of Θ (Castellaro et al, ) can be expressed as pfalse(normalΘfalse|Qfalse)=pfalse(Qfalse|normalΘfalse)pfalse(normalΘfalse)pfalse(Qfalse) …”
Section: Proposed Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the observed data Q and the parameter set , which contains n independent model parameters, Θ 1 , Θ 2 ...Θ n , the posterior of (Castellaro et al, 2017) can be expressed as…”
Section: Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such models, like Bayesian classifier, linear discriminant analysis, binary logistic regression, adaptive neurofuzzy inference system, etc., were successfully applied to skin detection [7,[22][23][24][25][26]. Among them, the Bayesian classifier is especially noteworthy not only in the field of skin detection but also in other disciplines because it provides the information concerning the probability that an observation belongs to a class, thereby evaluating the reliability of the result [27][28][29]. However, the Bayesian classifier, as well as other methods, still suffers from low performance, especially the high false detection rate (the percentage of nonskin classified as skin).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%