2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2004.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A unified theory for systems and cellular memory consolidation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
36
0
8

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
5
36
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is functionally analogous to STM, which is formed in or upstream of the mushroom body, probably without the involvement of extrinsic neurons or structures 30,32,37 , and synaptic output from the mushroom body is required specifically for its retrieval, but not its acquisition 38,39 . Taken together, our observations support a model where memory is first acquired in the mushroom body and is then transferred to the ellipsoid body for storage during memory consolidation, in agreement with various observations from other species where memory transfer from one brain region to another may occurr 6,33,36 . Combined with other recent studies, we would propose (i) that acquisition involves an initial association of an odor and shock in and/or upstream of the mushroom body 5,10 , (ii) that STM resides in the mushroom body 30,32,37 , (iii) that MTM is acquired in mushroom body a/b neurons and persists there via recurrent activity involving the mushroom body a¢/b¢ DPM (dorsalpaired medial) neurons and the mushroom body a/b neurons themselves 40 , (iv) that LTM consolidation involves the transference of memory to the ellipsoid body and (v) that LTM retrieval requires neural activity output from the ellipsoid body and from mushroom body neurons 34 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This result is functionally analogous to STM, which is formed in or upstream of the mushroom body, probably without the involvement of extrinsic neurons or structures 30,32,37 , and synaptic output from the mushroom body is required specifically for its retrieval, but not its acquisition 38,39 . Taken together, our observations support a model where memory is first acquired in the mushroom body and is then transferred to the ellipsoid body for storage during memory consolidation, in agreement with various observations from other species where memory transfer from one brain region to another may occurr 6,33,36 . Combined with other recent studies, we would propose (i) that acquisition involves an initial association of an odor and shock in and/or upstream of the mushroom body 5,10 , (ii) that STM resides in the mushroom body 30,32,37 , (iii) that MTM is acquired in mushroom body a/b neurons and persists there via recurrent activity involving the mushroom body a¢/b¢ DPM (dorsalpaired medial) neurons and the mushroom body a/b neurons themselves 40 , (iv) that LTM consolidation involves the transference of memory to the ellipsoid body and (v) that LTM retrieval requires neural activity output from the ellipsoid body and from mushroom body neurons 34 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Consistent and complementary to this notion, consolidation of LTM remains normal when NMDAR function is disrupted in the mushroom body (Table 1). Thus, the transference of memory from one anatomical location to another as consolidation progresses to LTM appears to occur in Drosophila, as in various other species 6,9,33 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, recent experimental findings indicate that, in addition to the hippocampus, long-term memory is stored in the neocortex at the time of training ). Our findings suggest that ERK-mediated synaptic plasticity in the hippocampus and PFC is required for memory storage, and are consistent with a theoretical model (the C theory) proposed by Dash et al (2004) that long-term memory storage takes place both in the hippocampus and in the neocortex at the time of training.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…There is significant interest in identifying the extrahippocampal substrates underlying remote memories that have become independent of the hippocampus (Hoffman and McNaughton 2002;Dash et al 2004;Frankland et al 2004;Wiltgen et al 2004;Bontempi 2005, 2006;Teixeira et al 2006;Tse et al 2007;Restivo et al 2009;Gusev and Gubin 2010;Wang and Morris 2010;Vetere et al 2011). In particular, the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) supports long-term expression of memories that initially depended upon the hippocampus (Takehara et al 2002(Takehara et al , 2003Takehara-Nishiuchi et al 2006;Quinn et al 2008;Takehara-Nishiuchi and McNaughton 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%