1991
DOI: 10.1002/pen.760310210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A unified simulation of the filling and postfilling stages in injection molding. Part I: Formulation

Abstract: This study employs a unified theoretical model to simulate the filling and postfilling stages of the injection-molding process. Implementation of such a model is based on a hybrid finite-element/finite-difference numerical solution of the generalized Hele-Shaw flow of a compressible viscous fluid under nonisothermal conditions. The shear viscosity of the polymeric material is represented by a Cross model for the shear-rate dependence and a WLF-type functional form for the temperature and pressure dependence, w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
111
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 264 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
111
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, we wish to mention that most of the numerical modeling studies in injection molding are based on the lubrication approximation to formulate the mold filling problems (see, e.g., Williams and Lord 1975;Hieber and Shen 1980;Dupret and Vanderschuren 1988;Chiang et al 1991;Dupret et al 1999), although a number of recent papers use a fully three-dimensional approach (see, e.g., Pichelin and Coupez 1999;Ilinca and He´tu 2001;Michaeli et al 2001) to address specific problems that need to solve the full Navier-Stokes equations. Nevertheless, all published theoretical studies and simulations are far from predicting flow-front finger-like instabilities described in this study due to the lack of physics in the models used.…”
Section: Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, we wish to mention that most of the numerical modeling studies in injection molding are based on the lubrication approximation to formulate the mold filling problems (see, e.g., Williams and Lord 1975;Hieber and Shen 1980;Dupret and Vanderschuren 1988;Chiang et al 1991;Dupret et al 1999), although a number of recent papers use a fully three-dimensional approach (see, e.g., Pichelin and Coupez 1999;Ilinca and He´tu 2001;Michaeli et al 2001) to address specific problems that need to solve the full Navier-Stokes equations. Nevertheless, all published theoretical studies and simulations are far from predicting flow-front finger-like instabilities described in this study due to the lack of physics in the models used.…”
Section: Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pvT -behavior of the polystyrene can be described by a so-called double-domain Tait equation [23]: …”
Section: Materials Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measuring and modeling rheology around the Glass transition temperature for amorphous polymer and in the crystallization range for semi-crystalline polymers remains a challenge and this explains using a mysterious "no flow temperature" in commercial software which is just a fitting parameter. The early models have been applied to simple plaque or disk geometries (Kamal and Kenig [21]; Huilier et al [22]; Titomanlio et al [23]) then generalized to Hele-Shaw models (Chiang et al [24]) and to 3D models (Silva et al [11]). x…”
Section: Injection Mouldingmentioning
confidence: 99%