2018
DOI: 10.1186/s12859-018-2123-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A two-tiered unsupervised clustering approach for drug repositioning through heterogeneous data integration

Abstract: BackgroundDrug repositioning is the process of identifying new uses for existing drugs. Computational drug repositioning methods can reduce the time, costs and risks of drug development by automating the analysis of the relationships in pharmacology networks. Pharmacology networks are large and heterogeneous. Clustering drugs into small groups can simplify large pharmacology networks, these subgroups can also be used as a starting point for repositioning drugs. In this paper, we propose a two-tiered drug-centr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interactions or relationships between various types of node data such as drugs, diseases, genes, and proteins, as well as each characteristic information of drug and disease, are considered in heterogeneous networks. These interactions contribute to identifying drug repositioning candidates from various perspectives [245]. Thus, most studies first constructed a heterogeneous network, and then a network-based algorithm was applied.…”
Section: Network-based Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interactions or relationships between various types of node data such as drugs, diseases, genes, and proteins, as well as each characteristic information of drug and disease, are considered in heterogeneous networks. These interactions contribute to identifying drug repositioning candidates from various perspectives [245]. Thus, most studies first constructed a heterogeneous network, and then a network-based algorithm was applied.…”
Section: Network-based Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[258] Kim et al [259] constructed a drug-disease association prediction model with five ML algorithms considering both linear and nonlinear algorithms, using similarities as features representing drug-disease pairs. Besides supervised models, there are also studies using unsupervised algorithms [245]. Hameed et al used four clustering algorithms on a drug network to predict drug ATC classes.…”
Section: Machine Learning Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, techniques and methods that fall into the category of unsupervised learning have shown encouraging results and are able to overcome some of the difficulties of vast, heterogeneous data (Casolla, et al 2019) (Hameed, et al 2018) (Ma, et al 2017) (Xiang, et al 2018). In this study, we focus on the area of unsupervised learning, presenting a complete methodological procedure that utilizes recent advances in the field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Large-scale drug-perturbed gene expression datasets, such as Connectivity Map (CMap) (Lamb et al , 2006; Subramanian et al , 2017), provide unprecedented opportunities for prioritizing treatments based on the associations between disease state and chemical intervention. Numerical computational approaches have been developed, taking full advantage of these high-throughput resources, for in silico prediction of disease–drug connectivity and drug–drug connectivity (El-Hachem et al , 2017; Hameed et al , 2018; Iorio et al , 2010, 2013; Lee et al , 2016a; Peyvandipour et al , 2018; Sirota et al , 2011). Notable successes have been achieved using CMap and its variants to uncover novel therapeutic redirections of existing drugs to treat various types of diseases, including obesity (Lee et al , 2016b; Liu et al , 2015a), neurodegenerative diseases (Sandor et al , 2017; Siavelis et al , 2016), gastrointestinal and liver diseases (Hicks et al , 2017), stroke and sepsis (Chen et al , 2015b) and cancers (Hsieh et al , 2016; Liu et al , 2015b; Xiang et al , 2016; Zhao et al , 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%