2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00779-019-01212-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A two-stage road traffic congestion prediction and resource dispatching toward a self-organizing traffic control system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chen and Grant-Muller [89] investigated the potential of dynamic neural networks to forecast motorway traffic in normal and abnormal conditions, highlighting the importance of RANs. Bouyahia et al [90] used the Markov Random Field (MRF) to model and predict the spread of traffic congestion and the Markov Decision Process (MDP) to allocate traffic resources, showing good improvement in accuracy. To further improve the performance, Cui et al [91] used a RAN in road traffic prediction by employing a controller of the network slice that periodically collected the information to predict future road traffic and applied the Bayesian Attractor Model (BAM) to estimate the required resources.…”
Section: Fuzzy Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chen and Grant-Muller [89] investigated the potential of dynamic neural networks to forecast motorway traffic in normal and abnormal conditions, highlighting the importance of RANs. Bouyahia et al [90] used the Markov Random Field (MRF) to model and predict the spread of traffic congestion and the Markov Decision Process (MDP) to allocate traffic resources, showing good improvement in accuracy. To further improve the performance, Cui et al [91] used a RAN in road traffic prediction by employing a controller of the network slice that periodically collected the information to predict future road traffic and applied the Bayesian Attractor Model (BAM) to estimate the required resources.…”
Section: Fuzzy Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bouyahia et al [117] used more advanced techniques, which are the Markov random field and Markov decision process approaches. The authors created a simulation which aimed at optimising a traffic network created from 217 intersections.…”
Section: Literature Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The penalty area of QL is to absorb a policy, which expresses an agent pardons action to take under what surroundings that does not even necessitate a model of the environment and it can grip difficulties with stochastic transitions and plunders, deprived from necessitating adaptations [20], [120]. [23] IoT representation annotation [24] Data-driven management [25] Data and Feedback validation [26] Visualization and understanding [27] Learning environment detection [28] Fraud detection [29] Prediction of the performance [50] Classification of capability [51] Tolerance related acquisition [52] IoT crime forensics [53] Fraud detection in IoT application [54] IoT decision process and making [55] LA Intrusion prediction [30] IoT representation annotation [31] Data-driven management [32] Data and Feedback validation [33] Visualization and understanding [34] Learning environment detection [35] Fraud detection [36] Predicting Software Defects on IoTs [56] Prediction of behavioral changes [57] Signature verification [58] Analysis and decisions [59] Auto-selection of IoT task [60] Traffic incident detection [61] Telecommunication [62] Internet networks [63] MDP Intrusion prediction [37] IoT representation annotation [38] Data-driven management [39] Data and Feedback validation [40] Visualization and understanding [41] Learning environment detection [42] Fraud detection [43] Re...…”
Section: Q-learningmentioning
confidence: 99%