2007
DOI: 10.1109/tro.2007.904904
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Two-Month Field Trial in an Elementary School for Long-Term Human–Robot Interaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
205
2
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 314 publications
(236 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
11
205
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, children were engaged with the robot and motivated to finish the task in their first session. In average, they only looked away from the robot 5% of the time and expressed amusement 16 signs of boredom. They revealed proactive behaviors and tried to communicate with the robot both verbally and non-verbally (communicative acts).…”
Section: Video Codingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, children were engaged with the robot and motivated to finish the task in their first session. In average, they only looked away from the robot 5% of the time and expressed amusement 16 signs of boredom. They revealed proactive behaviors and tried to communicate with the robot both verbally and non-verbally (communicative acts).…”
Section: Video Codingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies videotape the interaction situation, although there is not a common instrument to define interactive behaviour. For instance, the number of children interacting with a robot and the average time of interaction per week to evaluate childrenrobot interactive behaviour were defined in [27]. In [31], interaction between preschoolers and Aibo robots was videotaped, encoding the number of instances of treating the robot as an artefact or as a machine (poking, shaking), instances of affection (hugging, petting, kissing, stroking), the attempts at reciprocal interaction (offering a ball, talking to, motioning to) and the instances of apprehension (because children were interacting with unfamiliar objects).…”
Section: A Andrés Et Al / New Instrumentation For Human Robot Intermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the theoretical basis presented in [4,18,27,31], a table with the basic traits of the setting is proposed. This taxonomy allows the evaluation of the initial conditions of the interaction context (see Table 2).…”
Section: Assessing the Setting: How Was The Scenario?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, Osada (2005) made Papero perform the following activities: conversation, different reactions for touching different points, roll-call of attendees, quizzes, communication over mobile phone, and making stories. Kanda et al (2007) revealed that robots might need to use children's native language in order to establish relationships as well as to teach foreign languages. Robovie serves hundreds of interactive behaviours such as shaking hands, hugging, playing rock-paperscissors, exercising, greeting, kissing, singing, briefly conversing, and pointing to an object in the surroundings.…”
Section: R-learning Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%