A transferência de tecnologia universidade-empresa no contexto brasileiro: uma revisão de estudos científicos publicados entre os anos 2005 e 2009

Closs, Lisiane Quadrado; Ferreira, Gabriela Cardozo

doi:10.1590/s0104-530x2012000200014

Cited by 75 publications

(56 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The collaboration between universities and companies as a means to boost OI is the object of research of most of the studies identified (Alves & Pimenta-Bueno, 2014;Castro et al, 2014;Carrijo & Botelho, 2013;Closs & Ferreira, 2012;Fernandes et al, 2016;Gielfi et al, 2017;Matei et al, 2015;Oliveira & Balestrin, 2015;Schaeffer et al, 2015;Silva et al, 2013b;Stal & Fujino, 2016). Closs & Ferreira (2012) point out that university-company collaboration tends to be positive for companies because, in addition to reducing innovation costs, it also allows greater access to qualified people and university structures, especially laboratories. The findings of Castro et al (2014) suggest that the company-university relationship in Brazil tends to improve the innovative performance of firms.…”

Section: Presentation Of Results and Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Although many studies on OI address efforts to analyze the university-company relationship, some of these indicate that there are difficulties inherent in carrying out this kind of collaboration in Brazil (Closs & Ferreira, 2012;Alves & Pimenta-Bueno, 2014;Fernandes et al, 2016). For example, Fernandes et al (2016) observed that universities-notably engineering schools-contribute more to workforce formation than to economic collaborations with industries.…”

Section: Presentation Of Results and Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For example, Fernandes et al (2016) observed that universities-notably engineering schools-contribute more to workforce formation than to economic collaborations with industries. Among other difficulties identified, notable problems are: the resistance of many universities to the realization of partnerships with companies (Stal & Fujino, 2016); the existence of a short-term corporate vision which does not take into account the terms of scientific projects; the lack of institutional mechanisms for brokering and access to information regarding scientific production; bureaucratic and legal aspects; teams that are unprepared to manage cooperation projects; and difficulties in transferring incipient research results to the market (Araujo, 2012;Closs & Ferreira, 2012;Alves & Pimenta-Bueno, 2014). Difficulties related to reduced structure of university innovation agencies and communication between these agencies and the market were also identified (Desidério & Zilber, 2014).…”

Section: Presentation Of Results and Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

The landscape of open innovation in Brazil: An analysis of the recent literature

Ferrari

Scaliza

Jugend

2019

Prod.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Systematic Review Creative Commons Attribution License 1. Introduction The last decades have challenged several firms to adopt new innovation models (Sikimic et al., 2016; Slater et al., 2014; Von Hippel, 1986). These challenges arise from companies in different parts of the world simultaneously searching for markets and new ways of organizing innovation; this creates opportunities to access new technologies, and novel supply possibilities and partnerships, not only with local companies, but also with firms in other countries. In this scenario, the Open Innovation (OI) concept as proposed by Chesbrough (2003) has been highlighted by practitioners and researchers (e.g., Laursen & Salter, 2006; Randhawa et al., 2016; Rubera et al., 2016) because of its potential to intensify the flow of internal and external knowledge in order to improve the innovation process. Due to recent changes in the business environment, reflected in the increasing speed of technological changes and shortened life cycle of products, it is difficult for companies to ensure their competitiveness through the unique and exclusive internal development of new technologies (D'Ambrosio et al., 2017). Therefore, many companies are developing more open ways to innovate what is also known as OI: a model in which companies more intensively use ideas and technologies developed inside and outside their borders in the innovation process (Chesbrough, 2012; Bogers et al., 2017). Furthermore, OI also tends to provide new sources of revenue for firms through actions such as inclusion in new markets and the prospects of spin-offs and trading licenses. These

show abstract

Section: Presentation Of Results and Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Presentation Of Results and Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Presentation Of Results and Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The landscape of open innovation in Brazil: An analysis of the recent literature

Ferrari

Scaliza

Jugend

2019

Prod.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Innovation is taken into consideration by many as one of the major factors for the organizational and human development, becoming the main creator of competitive advantage, searching for more and more distinction among competitive companies, as the main key for the sustainability of the highly aggressive market (RABECHINI JÚNIOR; CARVALHO; LAURINDO, 2002;CLOSS;FERREIRA, 2012).…”

Section: Innovation Process Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Innovation quality: discussion and a model for measurement

Morais¹,

Júnior²,

Brejão³

et al. 2019

Ind. Jour. Man. & Prod.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article deals worth Innovation Quality (or Quality of Innovation) instead of Quality Innovation (or Innovation in Quality). It is recognized that innovations along with knowledge must be part of any kind of organization strategy as relevant tools in order to obtain competitive advantage. To associate quality and creativity to these factors makes the results more significant. The goal of the current study is to discuss innovation as a positive or negative factor for quality improvement and try to measure such relation through an indicator that is open to numerical determination with application in several practical conditions, especially in the productive activity. A set of dimensions is proposed for the innovation quality as a way to achieve such goal. It is proposed and discussed an index called Innovation Quality as a goal to quantify the real contribution of innovation in each case, so aiming to open a thorough discussion about this concept.

show abstract

“…Uma das formas de incentivar a geração de inovações tem ocorrido por meio da compreensão do processo de transferência de tecnologia, caracterizado pela passagem de conhecimentos gerados pela universidade a uma empresa que lhe permite inovar e ampliar sua capacidade tecnológica, possibilitando-lhe obter uma vantagem competitiva no mercado (Closs & Ferreira, 2012).…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

Perfil do núcleo de inovação tecnológica na gestão da inovação: um estudo na Universidade Federal de Alagoas

Pires

Rita

Pires

2020

Navus

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Para isso, a pesquisa classifica-se como pesquisa aplicada com enfoque qualitativo e objetivo exploratório. Trata-se de um estudo realizado na Universidade Federal de Alagoas, tendo como Unidade de investigação a Pró-Reitoria de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação (PROPEP), por meio do Núcleo de Inovação Tecnológica (NIT). O levantamento dos dados ocorreu por meio de entrevista com gestores do NIT/UFAL, além da análise à Lei nº 13.243/2016, a Resolução nº 15/2008-CONSUNI/UFAL e a Instrução Normativa nº 01/2008-PROPEP/UFAL, o que permitiu apontar o perfil institucional do Núcleo como "perfil legal" e, em poucos casos, como "perfil administrativo", devido, sobretudo à falta de pessoal para executar outros perfis, como o "voltado aos negócios". Por fim, devido à criação recente da maioria dos NITs do País e pela recente regulamentação da nova lei da inovação, o presente trabalho tem sua importância assegurada na medida em que aponta referências para a melhoria do processo de gestão da propriedade intelectual da UFAL e de outras ICTs, sobretudo no que se refere à melhoria do potencial dos NITs para que possam empreender ações mais efetivas com foco na transferência de tecnologias para a geração de inovações que impulsionem o desenvolvimento socioeconômico do país.

show abstract

A transferência de tecnologia universidade-empresa no contexto brasileiro: uma revisão de estudos científicos publicados entre os anos 2005 e 2009

Cited by 75 publications

References 16 publications

The landscape of open innovation in Brazil: An analysis of the recent literature

The landscape of open innovation in Brazil: An analysis of the recent literature

Innovation quality: discussion and a model for measurement

Perfil do núcleo de inovação tecnológica na gestão da inovação: um estudo na Universidade Federal de Alagoas

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About