2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2005.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A three-dimensional biomechanical comparison between turning strategies during the stance phase of walking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
152
6

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 163 publications
(161 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
3
152
6
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, anticipation in walking turns affects foot placement (Orendurff et al, 2006;Patla et al, 1999), and changes to ω 0 and θ i are initiated before the turning step in walking (Taylor et al, 2005). The finding that anticipatory compensations are used during both walking and running could therefore suggest that humans use some feed-forward strategies to execute anticipated maneuvers.…”
Section: Research Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, anticipation in walking turns affects foot placement (Orendurff et al, 2006;Patla et al, 1999), and changes to ω 0 and θ i are initiated before the turning step in walking (Taylor et al, 2005). The finding that anticipatory compensations are used during both walking and running could therefore suggest that humans use some feed-forward strategies to execute anticipated maneuvers.…”
Section: Research Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many have focused on joint motions [1][2][3][4], moments, and powers using two-and threedimensional inverse dynamics approaches [5][6]. Straightahead, steady-state walking across a range of speeds comprises the vast majority of nondisabled human gait studies, although work has expanded into turning [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14], obstacle avoidance [15][16][17][18], walk-to-run transitions [19][20][21], and even backward walking [22][23]. Human gait has been quite well described and is reasonably well understood, but there has been very limited research into how humans link steps together for functional community mobility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus far, two main strategies have been identified for the 180º turn during gait: turning in the direction contralateral to the support foot and turning in the direction ipsilateral to the support foot 36,39 . The strategy of turning in the direction ipsilateral to the support foot can be subdivided into two substrategies: the ipsilateral pivot and the ipsilateral crossover 39 .…”
Section: Effects Of the Intervention Program On 180º Turn Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strategy of turning in the direction ipsilateral to the support foot can be subdivided into two substrategies: the ipsilateral pivot and the ipsilateral crossover 39 . The ipsilateral turn strategy requires greater muscular demand and range of motion in the transverse plane than the contralateral turn strategy, which in turn provides a more stable support base, does not require increased coordination and is no more biomechanically demanding than straight gait 39 .…”
Section: Effects Of the Intervention Program On 180º Turn Performancementioning
confidence: 99%