2001
DOI: 10.1006/jcis.2001.7777
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Thermometric Titration Study on the Micelle Formation of Sodium Decyl Sulfate in Water

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
73
0
6

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(39 reference statements)
3
73
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, the differential enthalpy was used to determine the CMC. The observed enthalpy curves were differentiated with respect to the final surfactant concentration C and the extremum of the differential curve was taken to be the CMC [27]. There is an excellent agreement between the CMC values obtained from microcalorimetry and conductivity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the present study, the differential enthalpy was used to determine the CMC. The observed enthalpy curves were differentiated with respect to the final surfactant concentration C and the extremum of the differential curve was taken to be the CMC [27]. There is an excellent agreement between the CMC values obtained from microcalorimetry and conductivity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…There is an excellent agreement between the CMC values obtained from microcalorimetry and conductivity. The enthalpy of micellization ( H mic ) can be determined from the difference between the observed enthalpies of the two linear segments of the plots at the CMC [27,28] as shown in Fig. 3.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The anionic surface active agents: sodium dodecyl sulfate (Laurylsulfate, LS) (critical micellar concentration in water, cmc ¼ 7.4 mM [27]), sodium decylsulfate (DS) (cmc ¼ 33 mM [28]), with the same hydrophobic group but shorter aliphatic chain length, and sodium dodecylsulfonate (DD), with 12 carbon atoms in the hydrophobic chain but a different polar group, were obtained from Sigma (Spain). The cationic surfactants: N-cetyl-trimethyl ammonium chloride (CTAC) (cmc ¼ 1.31 mM [29]), N-decyl-trimethylammonium chloride (DTAC) (cmc ¼ 24.4 mM [29]) and dodecylpirydinium chloride (DP) (cmc ¼ 16.8 mM [30]) were purchased from Merck (Spain).…”
Section: Reagents and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3). The CMC of SDS and DTAB, determined from the inflection point in the DH/D[surfactant] versus the surfactant concentration curve, was 2.7 ± 0.2 mM and 14.8 ± 0.0 mM, respectively (Király & Dekány, 2001). The CMC value of SDS was a slightly lower than $3.3 mM reported in earlier studies (Wangsakan et al, 2004).…”
Section: Influence Of Surfactant Types On Surfactant-ca Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…7). The CMC and CMC * of SDS were determined in the absence and presence of CA from the inflection point in the DH/ D[surfactant] versus surfactant concentration curve as mentioned earlier (Király & Dekány, 2001;Majhi & Blume, 2001).…”
Section: Influence Of Temperature Ph and Salt On Ca-surfactant Intementioning
confidence: 99%