1978
DOI: 10.1002/pssa.2210470266
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A theoretical study of the current-phase relation in Josephson contacts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

14
50
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
14
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, when eV ≤ √ R∆, 9 the Josephson current through the SIS junction is nearly the same as without the probe, i.e. we recover the standard Ambegaokar-Baratoff result 9,[19][20][21][22][23][24][25] , as shown in Fig. 2(b).…”
Section: Short Josephson Junctionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Consequently, when eV ≤ √ R∆, 9 the Josephson current through the SIS junction is nearly the same as without the probe, i.e. we recover the standard Ambegaokar-Baratoff result 9,[19][20][21][22][23][24][25] , as shown in Fig. 2(b).…”
Section: Short Josephson Junctionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Firstly, we should have a sinusoidal current-phase dependency, which is in accordance with the transmission value and temperature in our experiment [18]. Secondly, the Andreev levels, that carry supercurrent in the junction, may only weakly deviate from the longitudinal propagation.…”
supporting
confidence: 52%
“…for arbitrary disorder potential. It is the multi-channel generalization of a formula first obtained by Haberkorn et al [24] (and subsequently rederived by several authors [25]- [27]) for the single-channel case (appropriate for a geometry such as a planar tunnel barrier, where the different scattering channels are uncoupled). A formula of similar generality for the conductance is the multi-channel Landauer formula [23,28] …”
mentioning
confidence: 96%