2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.gr.2015.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A tectonic model reconciling evidence for the collisions between India, Eurasia and intra-oceanic arcs of the central-eastern Tethys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
138
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 191 publications
(159 citation statements)
references
References 334 publications
9
138
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Subduction of the southern Neo-Tethyan flank of the 1873 spreading system from ~100 Ma would have been associated with progressively strengthening 1874 northward slab pull, to which we attribute the change towards largely northward convergence with1876 The role of two coeval north-dipping subduction zones in the Neo-Tethys (Fig. 26) were 1878 suggested to have contributed to the ~80 Ma acceleration of India in Gibbons et al (2015), which 1879 has recently been proposed as a mechanism for India's rapid northward advance using numerical 1880 (Fig. 25).…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Subduction of the southern Neo-Tethyan flank of the 1873 spreading system from ~100 Ma would have been associated with progressively strengthening 1874 northward slab pull, to which we attribute the change towards largely northward convergence with1876 The role of two coeval north-dipping subduction zones in the Neo-Tethys (Fig. 26) were 1878 suggested to have contributed to the ~80 Ma acceleration of India in Gibbons et al (2015), which 1879 has recently been proposed as a mechanism for India's rapid northward advance using numerical 1880 (Fig. 25).…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…A few years on, Audley-Charles (1966) provided the first 245 synthesis of stratigraphic evidence to describe the region's Mesozoic paleogeographic evolution in 246 (Gibbons et al, 2015;Matthews et al, 2012;van Hinsbergen et al, 2011). Although the 324 reconstructions are presented in 1 Myr intervals, no relative or absolute plate rotation parameters 325 have been provided, which limits the testability of such models.…”
Section: Explained the Geological Affinities Between 242mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1): an Andean-style subduction system along the southern continental margin of Eurasia (22) and an intraoceanic subduction system (the Trans-Tethyan Subduction System) in the northern Neo-Tethys Ocean (23,24). During the Cretaceous, the Trans-Tethyan Subduction System extended for at least 9,000 km in an east-west direction and was dominantly located at low latitude (25,26). The Andean-style subduction system that bounded the southern margin of Eurasia extended east-west for at least 13,000 km, but except in its easternmost extent was located farther north, at ∼20-30°N (27) (Fig.…”
Section: Tectonic Evolution Of the Neo-tethyan Ocean In The Late Cretmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The process of subduction was initiated at around 45 Ma near the Java trench. A widespread spreading in the Indian Ocean during the Late Eocene-Early Oligocene led to: (i) a change in convergence direction from north to NE and (ii) an increase in the rate of subduction (50-60 mm/year) along the Andaman-Sumatra and Java margins (Karig et al 1979;Liu et al 1983;Daly et al 1991;Hall 2012;Gibbons et al 2015). This spreading also in turn initiated the development of the Neogene AFB along the Sunda trench to the Andaman arc.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%