A systemic model for differentiating school technology integration

Abstract

School technology integration rarely begins with school or educator choice. It is part of a wider context where external and internal factors have direct influence on the goals and tools that are adopted over time. The objective of this study is to investigate the systemic conditions that contribute or inhibit the development of different activities by teachers making use of new media. We compiled a list of wellknown conditions for technology integration success and mapped these in the historical and culturally bound perspective of activity theory (cultural historical activity theory). We conducted a multiple case study analysis of four schools, public and private. The results point to unique and distinctive scenarios even when homogeneity would be expected, reinforcing the argument that material conditions do not determine pedagogical outcomes nor do they determine changes in practice. Beyond this, the study proposes a methodology that can help elicit tensions in technology integration, pointing to avenues for school development.

Adaptive pedagogical strategies responding to emergency remote teaching – immediate responses of Hungarian primary school teachers

“…The previously cited definition of technology integration does not encompass the complex nature of the phenomenon. Amiel, Kubota, and Wives (2016) also draw attention to the importance of context in the emergence, diffusion, and adoption of (digital) innovations in an educational setting: technology integration does not happen in isolation; it must be understood from a systemic perspective. Following an ecosystem approach, Amiel, Kubota, and Wives (2016) emphasise (after Nardi and O'Day 1999) that the focus should not be on the technology itself but on the activities executed with the help of the technology and the context of implementation.…”

ESport programs in high school: what’s at play?

“…On one hand, they must help young people develop digital skills, and on the other, they must do so within a safe framework (5). While the integration of technology is a vehicle for increasing student motivation and commitment, teachers, parents, and even UNESCO are concerned about the harmful effects of these tools (5,6). Gamification of the educational environmentor using gaming components in school contexts -is a prime example of the controversy surrounding the integration of technology into schools.…”