2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.virol.2013.07.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic review of the prevalence of mucosal and cutaneous human papillomavirus types

Abstract: Systematic reviews of the prevalence of different types of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) across a broad range of disease grades from normal to cancer are essential to gain basic knowledge of how widespread infections with the different HPV types are, and to provide information on the possible carcinogenicity of different HPV types. For HPV types that infect human mucosa, of which 12 are established causes of cervical cancer, we present the results of a systematic review and meta-analysis of 47 HPV types in cervic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
201
2
9

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 260 publications
(235 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
5
201
2
9
Order By: Relevance
“…26,27 Findings that most metachronous CIN1 and CIN3 lesions are caused by different HPV genotypes 28 are also in line with our conclusions. Several studies have investigated the clinical relevance of testing for HPV in cervical screening programs, in Europe [29][30][31][32][33][34] and North America.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…26,27 Findings that most metachronous CIN1 and CIN3 lesions are caused by different HPV genotypes 28 are also in line with our conclusions. Several studies have investigated the clinical relevance of testing for HPV in cervical screening programs, in Europe [29][30][31][32][33][34] and North America.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Human papillomavirus (HPV) has been described as an etiologic factor of several diseases, such as cervical and other anogenital cancers, and a subset of HPV-positive head and neck cancers [1][2][3][4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among HPV genotypes, HPV16 and 18 were considered to have the most potent carcinogenic potential (Dahlström et al, 2010;de Sanjose et al, 2010;Rijkaart et al, 2012;Bzhalava et al, 2013;Tjalma et al, 2013;Wheeler et al, 2014), being associated with about 70% of cervical cancers worldwide (de Sanjose et al, 2010;Li et al, 2011). The powerful carcinogenicity of HPV16/18 made them the most meaningful genotyping targets in clinical practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%