A Systematic Review of Patients’ Experiences in Communicating with Primary Care Physicians: Intercultural Encounters and a Balance between Vulnerability and Integrity

Abstract

Communication difficulties persist between patients and physicians. In order to improve care, patients’ experiences of this communication must be understood. The main objective of this study is to synthesize qualitative studies exploring patients’ experiences in communicating with a primary care physician. A secondary objective is to explore specific factors pertaining to ethnic minority or majority patients and their influence on patients’ experiences of communication. Pertinent health and social sciences electronic databases were searched systematically (PubMed, Cinahl, PsychNet, and IBSS). Fifty-seven articles were included in the review on the basis of being qualitative studies targeting patients’ experiences of communication with a primary care physician. The meta-ethnography method for qualitative studies was used to interpret data and the COREQ checklist was used to evaluate the quality of included studies. Three concepts emerged from analyses: negative experiences, positive experiences, and outcomes of communication. Negative experiences related to being treated with disrespect, experiencing pressure due to time constraints, and feeling helpless due to the dominance of biomedical culture in the medical encounter. Positive experiences are attributed to certain relational skills, technical skills, as well as certain approaches to care privileged by the physician. Outcomes of communication depend on patients’ evaluation of the consultation. Four categories of specific factors exerted mainly a negative influence on consultations for ethnic minorities: language barriers, discrimination, differing values, and acculturation. Ethnic majorities also raised specific factors influencing their experience: differing values and discrimination. Findings of this review are limited by the fact that more than half of the studies did not explore cultural aspects relating to this experience. Future research should address these aspects in more detail. In conclusion, all patients seemed to face additional cultural challenges. Findings provide a foundation for the development of tailored interventions to patients’ preferences, thus ensuring more satisfactory experiences. Health care providers should be sensitive to specific factors (cultural and micro-cultural) during all medical encounters.

Patient‐centered communication in type 2 diabetes: The facilitating and constraining factors in clinical encounters

“…Narrative medicine, or “the clinical practice fortified by narrative competence—the capacity to recognize, absorb, metabolize, interpret, and be moved by stories of illness,” might help to improve attentive, empathic, and person‐centered care and communication . A lack of time is a common justification not to provide person‐centered care, but in contrast with earlier findings, the patients did not mention short consultations as a barrier . This omission may reflect their resigned acceptance of a social norm that is perceived as immutable or the fact that they place a higher value on overcoming health literacy‐related barriers and on fostering the relationship dimension in communication.…”

“…47,48 A lack of time is a common justification not to provide person-centered care, 40,49 but in contrast with earlier findings, the patients did not mention short consultations as a barrier. 50 This omission may reflect their resigned acceptance of a social norm that is perceived as immutable or the fact that they place a higher value on overcoming health literacy-related barriers and on fostering the relationship dimension in communication.…”

Perceived Case Management Needs and Service Preferences of Frequent Emergency Department Users: Lessons Learned in a Large Urban Centre

“…A warm interpersonal manner and a non-judgmental stance are recognized aspects of a strong working alliance [37, 38]. Service users have previously reported appreciating the use of humor by health care professionals, as well as friendliness, genuine interest, empathy, careful listening, and open mindedness [39]. Interestingly, in our study, service users saw TCMs as “friends” and a means of social support.…”

The experience of adults with sickle cell disease and their HLA‐matched adult sibling donors after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

“…Even so, our study indicates that the recipient–donor groups had various relationships with the healthcare team: ambivalent, divergent, and trusting. These types of relationships primarily focused on the adequacy of communication, feelings of respectfulness and vulnerability, technical skills and competence in care, time constraints for making decisions and past negative experiences with care (Rocque & Leanza, ). These types of relationships have important implications for satisfaction with care including engaging in appropriate exchange of information.…”