2019
DOI: 10.1177/0149206318818718
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Systematic Review of Human Resource Management Systems and Their Measurement

Abstract: In the strategic human resource (HR) management literature, over the past three decades, a shared consensus has developed that the focus should be on HR systems rather than individual HR practices because the effects of HR practices are likely to depend on the other practices within the system. Despite this agreement, the extent to which the fundamental assumption in the field of interactions and synergy in the system holds true is unclear. We present a systematic review of 495 empirical studies on 516 HR syst… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
422
0
47

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 335 publications
(485 citation statements)
references
References 161 publications
16
422
0
47
Order By: Relevance
“…Although there is no absolute agreement among either scholars or practitioners on what exactly the group comprises, there is typically widespread agreement that it at least includes sophisticated approaches to recruitment and selection, incentive‐based compensation systems, extensive employee involvement, rigorous performance appraisal processes, and both generic and company‐specific training (Chuang & Liao, ; Huselid, ; Messersmith et al, ). A central tenet is the idea of high‐performance work systems, where synergies arise from bundling practices together, giving rise to mutually reinforcing impacts (Boon, den Hertog, & Lepak, ; Huselid, ). Attention has typically been paid to HPWPs for their potential to raise performance (Appelbaum, Bailey, Berg, & Kalleberg, ; Huselid, ).…”
Section: High‐performance Work Practices and Employee Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there is no absolute agreement among either scholars or practitioners on what exactly the group comprises, there is typically widespread agreement that it at least includes sophisticated approaches to recruitment and selection, incentive‐based compensation systems, extensive employee involvement, rigorous performance appraisal processes, and both generic and company‐specific training (Chuang & Liao, ; Huselid, ; Messersmith et al, ). A central tenet is the idea of high‐performance work systems, where synergies arise from bundling practices together, giving rise to mutually reinforcing impacts (Boon, den Hertog, & Lepak, ; Huselid, ). Attention has typically been paid to HPWPs for their potential to raise performance (Appelbaum, Bailey, Berg, & Kalleberg, ; Huselid, ).…”
Section: High‐performance Work Practices and Employee Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The focus of using expert systems in HRM has been steadily increasing with time. This is further evidenced in the recent shift of discussions related to individual HR practices in employing HR systems to the whole process [22]. This is also evidenced in the review by Sackett and Lievens [23] on the possible platforms to consider for improving the selection process.…”
Section: A Review Of the Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In response to the interview question "Do you have any recruitment management systems that you used or was it just emails and paper-based? ", most of the 74 participants responded negatively; participants 12,22,28,30,31,38, and 39 were some of the many who had commented that the process relied only on "email-and paper-based" methods. However, there were a few of the 17 organisations that seemed to have this worked out, which was appreciated by some hiring members, such as P11 who stated:…”
Section: Qualitative Analysis-thematic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first gap is, in the last three decades, strategic human resource management's available literature has established the shared consensus that the focus should be on human resource bundles instead of the human resource management system because every bundle in the system influence the bundles of human resource management adopted in the organization. Many synergies between human resource bundles don't align to date, their interactions and their outcomes (Boon, Hartog, & Lepak, 2019). Therefore, the study will address the above interaction and outcomes of the human resource bundle in a specific context.…”
Section: Gap Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%