2020 8th International Conference in Software Engineering Research and Innovation (CONISOFT) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/conisoft50191.2020.00014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Systematic Literature Review on Machine Learning for Automated Requirements Classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Binkhonain and Zhao (2019) introduced ML algorithms in the requirements elicitation domain by dividing the 24 related articles into 3 sections: NLP techniques, ML algorithms, and evaluation. Perez-Verdejo et al (2020) applied topic models and visualization techniques to analyze ML-based requirement classification articles. Wong et al (2017) identified various software requirements elicitation methods, including manual, rule-based, and ML-based approaches.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Binkhonain and Zhao (2019) introduced ML algorithms in the requirements elicitation domain by dividing the 24 related articles into 3 sections: NLP techniques, ML algorithms, and evaluation. Perez-Verdejo et al (2020) applied topic models and visualization techniques to analyze ML-based requirement classification articles. Wong et al (2017) identified various software requirements elicitation methods, including manual, rule-based, and ML-based approaches.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Abdelnabi et al (2021) [17] provided a comprehensive survey of methods for generating UML diagrams from natural language requirements, focusing on the automation and efficiency of these processes. Similarly, Mornie et al (2023) [18] and Perez-Verdejo et al (2020) [19] have systematically reviewed the application of NLP in visualizing UML models from user stories and classifying software requirements, respectively, highlighting the evolving challenges and the technologies employed [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%