A systematic evaluation of normalization methods in quantitative label-free proteomics

Abstract

To date, mass spectrometry (MS) data remain inherently biased as a result of reasons ranging from sample handling to differences caused by the instrumentation. Normalization is the process that aims to account for the bias and make samples more comparable. The selection of a proper normalization method is a pivotal task for the reliability of the downstream analysis and results. Many normalization methods commonly used in proteomics have been adapted from the DNA microarray techniques. Previous studies comparing normalization methods in proteomics have focused mainly on intragroup variation. In this study, several popular and widely used normalization methods representing different strategies in normalization are evaluated using three spike-in and one experimental mouse label-free proteomic data sets. The normalization methods are evaluated in terms of their ability to reduce variation between technical replicates, their effect on differential expression analysis and their effect on the estimation of logarithmic fold changes. Additionally, we examined whether normalizing the whole data globally or in segments for the differential expression analysis has an effect on the performance of the normalization methods. We found that variance stabilization normalization (Vsn) reduced variation the most between technical replicates in all examined data sets. Vsn also performed consistently well in the differential expression analysis. Linear regression normalization and local regression normalization performed also systematically well. Finally, we discuss the choice of a normalization method and some qualities of a suitable normalization method in the light of the results of our evaluation.

Performance Evaluation and Online Realization of Data-driven Normalization Methods Used in LC/MS based Untargeted Metabolomics Analysis

“…The Log Transformation was reported to be a powerful tool for making skewed distributions symmetric12, it was therefore a very suitable method for treating metabolomics data (the distribution of which was right-skewed)23. Moreover, some methods (e.g., the VSN ) in G-A was also found to be the most capable one in reducing variation between technical replicates in proteomics, and consistently well-performed in identifying differential expression profiles97. The Contrast was the only one method in group C (G-C, the Poor Performance Group ), the performance of which was consistently the worst across 10 sub-datasets among all 16 methods.…”

d-Lysergic acid diethylamide has major potential as a cognitive enhancer

“…Fold change of the intensities assigned to each protein was calculated within each experimental batch. Fold change values were normalized using the vsn package in RStudio (47,48). Statistical analyses were performed with one sample t-test (p<0.05) against 0 value (no change).…”

Genetic control of the HDL proteome

“…Normalization of shotgun proteomic data is a continuous struggle in the field (Välikangas et al, 2018). HDL is a rather uncomplicated mixture containing only ~100 proteins.…”