2007
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-7-40
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic comparison of software dedicated to meta-analysis of causal studies

Abstract: Background: Our objective was to systematically assess the differences in features, results, and usability of currently available meta-analysis programs.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
120
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 177 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
120
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We used a software program named 'comprehensive metaanalysis' for the majority of our analyses (Borenstein, Hedges, Higgins, & Rothestein, 2009). The program was chosen because it is one of the most widely used software programs specialized for meta-analysis (Bax et al, 2007). Correlations between L1 and L2 with regard to the target domains such as phonological awareness, decoding, vocabulary, and morphological awareness were entered into predefined data sheet in the program together with the study name and sample size of each study.…”
Section: Meta-analysis Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used a software program named 'comprehensive metaanalysis' for the majority of our analyses (Borenstein, Hedges, Higgins, & Rothestein, 2009). The program was chosen because it is one of the most widely used software programs specialized for meta-analysis (Bax et al, 2007). Correlations between L1 and L2 with regard to the target domains such as phonological awareness, decoding, vocabulary, and morphological awareness were entered into predefined data sheet in the program together with the study name and sample size of each study.…”
Section: Meta-analysis Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have previously investigated the association between TNF-α G-308A polymorphism and MI risk, but have yielded inconsistent results. Meta-analysis is a useful method to combine various single studies to obtain a larger sample size (Bax et al, 2007;Zeng et al, 2015a), and has been widely used in genetic association studies (Leng et al, 2013;Mao et al, 2013;Yan et al, 2014;Suo et al, 2015;Zeng et al, 2015b). In the present study, we performed a metaanalysis to evaluate the association between TNF-α G-308A polymorphism and MI risk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies describing the multivariate analysis by relative risk or hazard ratio were not combined. The Meta-DiSc software, version 1.4 (Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain) 9 was used for the statistical analysis, except for the combination of odds ratios, when the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis, version 2 (Biostat, Inc, Englewood, NJ, USA) 10 was used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%