Proceedings 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2006. ICRA 2006.
DOI: 10.1109/robot.2006.1642350
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic analytical method for PKM stiffness matrix calculation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
110
0

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
110
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These methods are based on the Jacobian matrix [20][21][22]; the Finite Element Analysis (FEA) [23][24] and the Matrix Structural Analysis (MSA) [19,[25][26][27][28].…”
Section: Models For Stiffness Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods are based on the Jacobian matrix [20][21][22]; the Finite Element Analysis (FEA) [23][24] and the Matrix Structural Analysis (MSA) [19,[25][26][27][28].…”
Section: Models For Stiffness Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the absolute positioning accuracy of manipulators can be improved by kinematic calibration. On the other hand, there are a few studies about non-kinematic calibration [6][7][8][9][10][11]. This is because nongeometric factors are complicated to analyze.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this method is usually applied at the final design stage because of the high computational expenses [7]. The MSA method [8] incorporates the main ideas of the FEA, but operates with rather large elements -3D flexible beams. This obviously leads to the reduction of the computational efforts, but does not eliminate the disadvantages of FEA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%