2015
DOI: 10.15579/gcsr.vol2.ch1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Survey on Keystroke Dynamics Biometrics: Approaches, Advances, and Evaluations

Abstract: In this review paper we present a comprehensive survey of research efforts in the past couple of decades on keystroke dynamics biometrics. We review the literature in light of various feature extraction, feature matching and classification methods for keystroke dynamics. We also discuss recent trends in keystroke dynamics research, including its use in mobile environments, as a soft biometrics, and its fusion with other biometric modalities. We further address the evaluation of keystroke biometric systems, inc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Keystroke dynamic features can be extracted using the timing information of the key press and release events. The hold time of individual keys and the latency between keys (the time interval between pressing one key and a succeeding key) are typically exploited [ 20 ]. In addition to ordered pairs (two successive keystrokes), n-tuples of a sequence of keystrokes have also been investigated and keystroke biometrics research has utilised many machine learning and classification techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Keystroke dynamic features can be extracted using the timing information of the key press and release events. The hold time of individual keys and the latency between keys (the time interval between pressing one key and a succeeding key) are typically exploited [ 20 ]. In addition to ordered pairs (two successive keystrokes), n-tuples of a sequence of keystrokes have also been investigated and keystroke biometrics research has utilised many machine learning and classification techniques.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Digraph latencies within the virtual letter pairs were then used to produce a score [3]. Features like digraphs and trigraphs rely only on the word context [4]. To solve the [5] used digraphs, trigraphs and n-graphs features along with the keyword latencies i.e.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This difference in std distance suggest that good users tend to have less keystrokes variations. Table 1 (Left) were calculated independently for each of the 300 subjects (300 different decision thresholds), these EERs are calculated as the average of the individual EER from all subjects [3,10,12]. To analyse the impact of the score normalization in the performance, average EER from the whole database (using only one decision threshold for all users) are summarized in Table 3.…”
Section: Stability Of the Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the wide range of potential practical applications mentioned above, a heterogeneous community of researchers from different fields has produced in the last decade a very large number of works studying different aspects of keystroke recognition. Those contributions have been compiled in several surveys [2,3,4,5] that describe the technology in terms of performance, databases, privacy and security. The techniques are usually divided into fixed text (the text used to model the typing behavior of the user and the text used to authenticate is the same) and free text (the text used to model the typing behavior and the text used to authenticate do not necessarily match).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%