2011
DOI: 10.1134/s0361768811030029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A survey of methods for constructing covering arrays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For simplicity, assume that only interaction (c, d, f ) is faulty, and only interaction (c, d, e) is infeasible, and all other interactions pass the testing. If one assigns configurations 1, 3,5,7,9,11,13,15 into Server 1 , configurations 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 into Server 2 , and 4-11 configurations into Server 3 .…”
Section: Merging Concurrent Testing Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For simplicity, assume that only interaction (c, d, f ) is faulty, and only interaction (c, d, e) is infeasible, and all other interactions pass the testing. If one assigns configurations 1, 3,5,7,9,11,13,15 into Server 1 , configurations 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 into Server 2 , and 4-11 configurations into Server 3 .…”
Section: Merging Concurrent Testing Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Covering arrays reveal faults that arise from improper interaction of t or fewer elements [9]. There are numerous computational and mathematical approaches for construction of covering arrays with a number of tests as small as possible [3], [7].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Covering arrays reveal faults that arise from improper interaction of t or fewer elements [10]. There are numerous computational and mathematical approaches for construction of covering arrays with few tests [4], [8].…”
Section: B Traditional Combinatorial Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basic goal of such techniques is to cover every t − tuple of any input interaction of system under test at least once [1]. Two survey papers have been written on the topic of combinatorial testing strategies [20, 21] while Kuliamin and Petukhov [22] present a survey on the methods of constructing CAs. The methods for constructing CAs can be categorized into three categories [1, 19]: (1) algebraic methods (2) meta-heuristic methods and (3) greedy search methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%