1996
DOI: 10.1016/0377-2217(95)00070-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A survey of business failures with an emphasis on prediction methods and industrial applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
280
0
25

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 489 publications
(336 citation statements)
references
References 107 publications
6
280
0
25
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of the study of 47 prediction models provided by Dimitras et al [67] summarize the number of countries and number of models that include particular financial ratios. They identified 18 significant explanatory variables used in the prediction models worldwide.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of the study of 47 prediction models provided by Dimitras et al [67] summarize the number of countries and number of models that include particular financial ratios. They identified 18 significant explanatory variables used in the prediction models worldwide.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relationships and research trends in the prediction of business failure were discussed in detail e.g. by Dimitras et al (1996). While since the 1980s the use of MDA has decreased it still remains a generally accepted standard method and it is frequently used as a baseline method for comparative studies (Altman and Narayanan 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classical approach -a univariate analysis -uses single indicators (see Balcaen & Ooghe 2006;Dimitras et al 1996). For that purpose, financial ratios indicating the profitability of assets (ROA) or sales (ROS) have been especially popular.…”
Section: Stream Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A bankruptcy model results in a score, bankruptcy probability or a binary outcome of survival or failure (Altman & Narayanan 1997;Dimitras et al 1996;Bellovary et al 2007). Of these, models resulting in a bankruptcy probability can be considered the best option, as they allow the comparison of a firm's performance dynamically on a unified scale (for instance, from 0% to 100% or from 0 to 1).…”
Section: Stream Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%