1988
DOI: 10.1016/0016-7037(88)90030-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A surface complex reaction model for the pH-dependence of corundum and kaolinite dissolution rates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

19
88
1
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 294 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
19
88
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…2, the rate of kaolinite dissolution in acetic acid was dependent upon the pH value of the solution, in the range of pH 2.5-5.5, and the logarithm of the rate of kaolinite dissolution was linearly dependent upon the solution pH. The reaction order with respect to n H + of the proton-promoted dissolution reaction is 0.28, approximately close to previous reports [2,13,15,36]. Then, the dissolution of kaolinite enhanced only by protons could be described by following equation:…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2, the rate of kaolinite dissolution in acetic acid was dependent upon the pH value of the solution, in the range of pH 2.5-5.5, and the logarithm of the rate of kaolinite dissolution was linearly dependent upon the solution pH. The reaction order with respect to n H + of the proton-promoted dissolution reaction is 0.28, approximately close to previous reports [2,13,15,36]. Then, the dissolution of kaolinite enhanced only by protons could be described by following equation:…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Dissolution of kaolinite in solutions of oxalate, malonate, salicylate, and phthalate ligands [13][14][15] showed that oxalate enhanced dissolution of kaolinite to the greatest extent, followed by salicylate. Malonate and phthalate showed little effect on dissolution rates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the conversion rates, we estimated the reaction rate coefficient of dawsonite assuming r = kS(Ω-1), an average reactive surface area of 0.1 m 2 , and 2 000 times dawsonite supersaturation estimated by the PHREEQC speciation code (Parkhurst and Appelo, 1999) using the llnl.dat database and assuming NaHCO 3 and aluminium concentrations given by nahcolite and gibbsite saturations respectively, we get reaction rate coefficients of 1.17 × 10 -13 and 2.83 × 10 -12 moles/m 2 s respectively from kaolinite and gibbsite. These rates are indeed orders of magnitude slower than the corresponding dawsonite dissolution rate coefficients reported by Hellevang et al (2005Hellevang et al ( , 2010, but is in the same range as estimated kaolinite (e.g., Carroll-Webb and Walther, 1988;Bauer and Berger, 1998) and gibbsite (Nagy and Lasaga, 1992) dissolution rates at these conditions. At this point we can thus only assume that the precipitation rates of dawsonite at high supersaturations are faster than the aluminium source dissolution rates and we can not exclude the fast dawsonite precipitation rates as predicted from the dissolution rate experiments.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 45%
“…Uptake is reduced by order-of-magnitude increases in the concentration of the 80 supporting electrolyte below pH ~ 7-8, but uptake is insensitive to change in electrolyte concentration above this pH range (Figure 2a) Cowan " 60 et al, 1992;O'Day, 1992;Zachara et al, 1994). Based o. on solution uptake experiments and potentiometric ti-_~ trations, uptake of cations, anions, and/or protons from o solution onto kaolinite as a function ofpH is generally O 40 modeled assuming two classes of sites: 1) ion exchange *~ or nonspecific adsorption sites that exchange background electrolyte cations with weakly bound, hydrat-20 ed adions ("outer-sphere" complexes) and 2) specific adsorption at amphoteric surface hydroxyl sites (e.g., AI-OH, St-OH) in which surface sites hydrolyze and adions bond directly to surface oxygens such that they are not easily displaced by electrolyte ions ("innersphere" complexes) (Farrah et al, 1980;Riese, 1982;Sposito, 1984;Zachara et al, i 1988;Carroll-Webb and Walther, 1988;Cowan et al, 1992;Singh and Mattigod, 1992;Wieland and Stumm, 1992;Xie and Walther, 1992;Zachara et al, 1994). In these previous macroscopic studies, however, different models of ion uptake have reproduced experimental ~" -5 data equally well and do not supply a unique solution.…”
Section: Sorption and Sorption Sites On Kaolinitementioning
confidence: 99%