2015 IIAI 4th International Congress on Advanced Applied Informatics 2015
DOI: 10.1109/iiai-aai.2015.284
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Study of the Reliability and Validity of Felder-Soloman Index of Learning Styles in Mandarin Version

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each dimension is further allocated in contradicting learning style. The validity of the ILS has been reported by various studies [4]- [9]. Each bipolar characteristic in terms of teaching styles is briefly described as follows:…”
Section: A Felder-soloman Index Of Learning Stylesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each dimension is further allocated in contradicting learning style. The validity of the ILS has been reported by various studies [4]- [9]. Each bipolar characteristic in terms of teaching styles is briefly described as follows:…”
Section: A Felder-soloman Index Of Learning Stylesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the dimension of reception, visual learners prefer information in the form of diagrams, flow charts, pictures, or films, whereas verbal learners prefer information that is presented in writing. In the dimension of understanding, sequential learners use a logically linear approach to gain understanding, whereas global learners need a comprehensive understanding of the topic before mastering details (Felder & Silverman, 1988; Wang & Mendori, 2015). Today, FSLSM is widely used in technology-enhanced learning systems (Latham, Crockett, & McLean, 2014).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A meta-analysis by Felder and Spurlin (2005) indicates that the internal consistency reliability coefficient of the ILS scale is between .41 and .76 (only one study has a reliability of less than .50 in the indicator of sequential/global learning). The ILS has been translated into a Mandarin version and shows acceptable internal consistency reliability that is within the range of .51 to .64 (Wang & Mendori, 2015).…”
Section: Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was achieved by using the command 'data' ˃ select cases ˃ 'random sample of cases' ˃ 'sample' ˃ 'sample size' '% all cases. A questionnaire adapted from Felder-Silverman Model [17] designed to assess the preference of the students on four learning areas: preferred way of perceiving information-the intuitive/sensing learners, preferred processing of information-the active/reflective learners, preferred receiving Chanel of information-the visual/verbal learners and preferred progressing to understanding the global and sequential learners was used to collect data. The data collected using learning style questionnaires were analysed in General Linear Model in SPSS windows using the command 'Analyse' ˃ 'General Linear Model'˃ 'Univariate or Multivariate' ˃ 'Model' ˃ 'full factorial' ˃ 'Option' ˃ 'Display descriptive statistics' ˃ 'Observe power' ˃ 'Continue' ˃ 'Post hock' ˃ 'Tukey' ˃ 'Continue' ˃ Ok.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, Wang and Mendori [17] classifies learners into four paired types of learning styles and strategies as active and reflective learners, sensing and intuitive learners, visual and verbal learners, and sequential and global learners. However, Janet [18] adds an aspect of kinaesthetic learning style a subgroup of sensing learning style.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%