2020
DOI: 10.1080/17439760.2020.1858337
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A strengths-based approach to chronic pain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, contrary to prior cross-sectional evidence of no correlation between application of character strengths and self-reports of physical health [7], this work provides at least modest empirical evidence that possessing and using SMC may be beneficial for one's physical health (for both self-reported assessment of one's physical health as well as cardiovascular disease prevention). In this vein, our evidence is also in line with the recent findings on the usefulness of strength-based interventions in pain self-efficacy and the capacity to function despite pain [16] and in older age [15]. Regarding the mental health outcomes, our results corroborate the earlier evidence from experimental studies [14,25,71], meta-analyses [9, 17, The E values for effect estimates are the minimum strength of association on the risk ratio scale that an unmeasured confounder would need to have with both the exposure and the outcome to fully explain away the observed association between the exposure and outcome, conditional on the measured covariates.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Specifically, contrary to prior cross-sectional evidence of no correlation between application of character strengths and self-reports of physical health [7], this work provides at least modest empirical evidence that possessing and using SMC may be beneficial for one's physical health (for both self-reported assessment of one's physical health as well as cardiovascular disease prevention). In this vein, our evidence is also in line with the recent findings on the usefulness of strength-based interventions in pain self-efficacy and the capacity to function despite pain [16] and in older age [15]. Regarding the mental health outcomes, our results corroborate the earlier evidence from experimental studies [14,25,71], meta-analyses [9, 17, The E values for effect estimates are the minimum strength of association on the risk ratio scale that an unmeasured confounder would need to have with both the exposure and the outcome to fully explain away the observed association between the exposure and outcome, conditional on the measured covariates.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The associations between character strengths and specific physical diseases have also been examined. For example, there is some experimental evidence that application of character strengths can be helpful in improving pain self-efficacy and capacity to function with pain [ 16 ]. A rigorous review of clinical studies on character strengths-based interventions for patients with chronic illnesses revealed that these interventions boosted self-esteem and self-efficacy and reduced depression [ 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, this domain was either included indirectly in flourishing instruments (see for example Su et al, 2014) or measured as an unrelated phenomenon (see for example McGrath, 2015;Blanchard et al, 2019). However, the importance of character strengths and virtues for human flourishing has been long argued by philosophers (Pieper, 1966;Aristotle and Brown, 2009;Baril, 2016) and, more recently, also by psychologists (Graziosi et al, 2020;Niemiec, 2020;Weziak-Bialowolska et al, 2021). Additionally, this study corroborates that, although measures of mental state are covered by instruments of psychological well-being (Ryff and Keyes, 1995) and measures of flourishing are covered by instruments of psychological and social well-being (Diener et al, 2010), a more holistic conceptualization of flourishing goes beyond these areas of human functioning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, there is robust evidence that interventions targeting signature strengths are effective in raising various indicators of well-being; results regarding depression are mixed, but they point to a potential contribution for ameliorating depressive symptoms ( Proyer et al, 2015 ). At the same time, research has also shown that it is fruitful to work on those character strengths most associated with the components of well-being (e.g., Proyer et al, 2013b ; Graziosi et al, 2020 ; Yan et al, 2020 ). Given this evidence, the question that arises is whether it would be more beneficial for mental health to design interventions targeting signature strengths or interventions targeting the strengths that we found in our study to be more strongly associated with mental health (i.e., theological strengths and strengths of restraint, primarily) even in the case where neither of these had been identified as signature strengths.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%