“…It is worth noting that although many Cu‐based compounds have been intensively optimized for thermoelectric applications, [ 34,36–43 ] most of these studies focus on the diamond‐like structures, for example, chalcopyrite, famatinite, and stannite, which only contain the corner‐sharing Cu X 4 tetrahedra and are certainly not ideal thermoelectric materials in terms of κ L based on our analysis (e.g., the κ L of CuFeS 2 , CuFeSe 2 , CuGaTe 2 , Cu 3 SbS 4 , and Cu 2 ZnSnSe 4 at 300 K are 7.8, 6.5, 6.4, 3.5, and 3.2 Wm −1 K −1 , respectively [ 24,52,53 ] ). To illustrate this, in Figure , we compare the M ‐Se bond lengths and 2 nd IFCs of Cu/Se and Ag/Se compounds with chalcopyrite and ZrCuSiAs‐type structures.…”