While solar geoengineering (SG) has the potential to restore average surface temperatures by increasing planetary albedo 1-4 , this would reduce precipitation 5-7. Thus, although SG might reduce globally-aggregated risks, it may increase climate risks for some regions 8-10. Here, using HiFLOR-which resolves tropical cyclones and has an improved representation of present-day precipitation extremes 11,12-alongside 12 models from the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project, we analyse the fraction of locations that see their local climate change exacerbated or moderated by SG. Rather than restoring temperatures, we assume that SG is applied to halve the warming produced by doubling CO2 (half-SG). In HiFLOR, half-SG offsets most of the CO2-induced increase of simulated tropical cyclone intensity, while it does not exacerbate the effect of doubling CO2 on temperature, water availability, extreme temperature or extreme precipitation averaged over any IPCC-SREX region. Evaluating this response at the model resolution, we also find less than 0.4% of the land surface sees exacerbation of extreme precipitation or water availability. Thus, while concerns about the inequality of solar geoengineering impacts are appropriate, the quantitative extent of inequality may be overstated 13 .