2012
DOI: 10.1109/tbme.2012.2189713
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A State-Space Modeling Approach for Localization of Focal Current Sources From MEG

Abstract: State-space modeling is a promising approach for current source reconstruction from magnetoencephalography (MEG) because it constrains the spatiotemporal behavior of inverse solutions in a flexible manner. However, state-space model-based source localization research remains underdeveloped; extraction of spatially focal current sources and handling of the high dimensionality of the distributed source model remain problematic. In this study, we propose a novel state-space model-based method that resolves these … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(8) converges to that computed from the forward model Eq. (1) provided the number of expansion terms M l for degree l is sufficiently large.…”
Section: Computation Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…(8) converges to that computed from the forward model Eq. (1) provided the number of expansion terms M l for degree l is sufficiently large.…”
Section: Computation Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…• For measurements with low SNR, Methods 2a and 2b (that bases on reconstructed data) offer a significantly more accurate localization than Method 1 (where direct measurements were used) despite errors in data interpolation and field reconstruction. This is because the BC integrals over the entire surface (instead of scattered interpolated data) are taken into account in the physics-based model (8) to reconstruct a smooth MFD leading to a more representative set of "reconstructed measurements" for ANS location. …”
Section: Error Analysis and Discussion Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations