2003
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20030958
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simple empirical redshift indicator for gamma-ray bursts

Abstract: Abstract. We propose a new empirical redshift indicator for gamma-ray bursts. This indicator is easily computed from the gamma-ray burst spectral parameters and its duration, and it provides "pseudo-redshifts" accurate to a factor two. Possible applications of this redshift indicator are briefly discussed.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

10
104
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
10
104
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It is important to mention here that this error is a statistical one, while the systematic error is much bigger (Atteia 2003;Pelangeon et al 2006;Pelangeon 2008), of a factor of ∼1.5, i.e., z = 0.9 +0.45 −0.3 . This result agrees with the redshift range found from the Amati relation for episode 2 and is also consistent with the upper limit determined with method 1.…”
Section: Methods 3: Empirical Methods For the Pseudo-redshiftmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is important to mention here that this error is a statistical one, while the systematic error is much bigger (Atteia 2003;Pelangeon et al 2006;Pelangeon 2008), of a factor of ∼1.5, i.e., z = 0.9 +0.45 −0.3 . This result agrees with the redshift range found from the Amati relation for episode 2 and is also consistent with the upper limit determined with method 1.…”
Section: Methods 3: Empirical Methods For the Pseudo-redshiftmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…From a sample of 17 GRBs with known redshift reported in Atteia (2003) we compute the theoretical evolution of X with the redshift z, that is X = f (z). Then we invert the relation to derive a pseudo-redshift from the value of X.…”
Section: Methods 3: Empirical Methods For the Pseudo-redshiftmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Neither the time history, nor the spectrum, nor the intensity of this event was exceptional in any way. Atteia (2003) has proposed a simple redshift estimator based on the photon flux, energy spectrum, and duration of a GRB. Using this method, we obtain z % 0:8, with a statistical uncertainty of about 50%.…”
Section: Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Band & Preece 2005;Ghirlanda et al 2005;Nakar & Piran 2005;Sakamoto et al 2006;Butler et al 2007;Cabrera et al 2007;Schaefer & Collazzi 2007;Butler et al 2009;Firmani et al 2009;Krimm et al 2009;Butler et al 2010;Shahmoradi & Nemiroff 2011;Collazzi et al 2012;Kocevski 2012;Goldstein 2012). Despite these discussions, the E pi -E iso relation was quickly proposed as a tool to infer GRB redshifts (Atteia 2003), to constrain the physics of the prompt emission (Eichler & Levinson 2004;Rees & Mészáros 2005) and the geometry of GRB jets (Lamb et al 2005;Toma et al 2005), and to standardize GRBs, in much the same way as the Phillips relation was used to standardize SNe Ia (Phillips 1993). This last approach aims at constructing standard candles with GRBs and at using them to constrain the cosmological parameters (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%