2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-9133.2012.00786.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Signaling Perspective on Employment‐Based Reentry Programming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
109
1
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 220 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
109
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, they found that community employment programs did not reduce the odds of recidivism for both groups (Visher et al, 2005). Bushway and Apel (2012) report that at the national level, 35% of incarcerated inmates have a high school diploma compared with 82% of the general population. Furthermore, Bushway and Apel state that the formerly incarcerated demonstrate characteristics that parallel other hard-to-employ populations, such as welfare recipients and high school dropouts.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, they found that community employment programs did not reduce the odds of recidivism for both groups (Visher et al, 2005). Bushway and Apel (2012) report that at the national level, 35% of incarcerated inmates have a high school diploma compared with 82% of the general population. Furthermore, Bushway and Apel state that the formerly incarcerated demonstrate characteristics that parallel other hard-to-employ populations, such as welfare recipients and high school dropouts.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, Bushway and Apel (2012) discuss how a longitudinal research study conducted in New Jersey over an 18-year period demonstrated that upwards of 25% of convicted felons desisted from offending during that time period. However, most evaluations of employment training programs for the formerly incarcerated remain shortsighted and examine recidivism rates within a 2-year pre and posttreatment period, which is problematic because they are unable to identify potential offenders who will desist for the long term (Bushway & Apel, 2012).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As discussed previously, employment has a significant effect on preventing future criminal offending (Bahr, Harris, Fisher, & Armstrong, 2010;Berg & Heubner, 2011;Bullis, Yovanoff, Mueller, & Havel, 2002;Bushway & Apel, 2012;Justice Policy Institute, 2007). Thus, the effect of community-based alternatives on employment and reoffending needs to be further explored.…”
Section: The Necessity Of Further Research and Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, studies show employment post incarceration decreases repeated offending (Bahr et al, 2010;Berg & Huebner, 2011;Bushway & Apel, 2012). For example, the Transition Research on Adjudicated Youth in Community Settings (TRACS) study found immediate work or return to school upon release had a significantly positive impact on reentry and decreased recidivism .…”
Section: The Importance Of Employability and Social Skillsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation